Left Wing History (5):
Waterloo 1815

Reckless Uxbridge?

by Gary Cousins, Germany

Such recollections make all the more remarkable, and perhaps incredible, Vivian’s recollection of an incident which happened after Uxbridge returned from posting Vandeleur’s Brigade:

“Lord Uxbridge shortly returned to me, and finding the fire still heavy, and the enemy evidently in great force immediately in our front, he asked me whether we had not better advance and charge. The smoke at this moment was so dense on the side of the hill, that it was scarcely possible to see ten yards before us; and consequently, no enemy being visible, I observed, “that as my brigade was in perfect order, I thought it would be advisable not to hazard an attack whereby we might be thrown into confusion, which it would be difficult to repair; that if the enemy appeared on the crest of the hill through the smoke, by a sudden and unexpected charge on them we could, no doubt, drive them back.”

His Lordship then dismounted from his horse, and advanced himself on foot and unattended down the hill, hoping to be able to see under the smoke and make his own observations. I rode down to him and begged him not to expose himself so; on which he returned, saying he agreed with me in thinking that I had better remain steady, ready to attack if the enemy appeared; and, mounting his horse, he left me to join the Duke, and I saw no more of him during the day.

I mention this anecdote not only as descriptive of my position, but in justice to Lord Uxbridge: it will prove to those who imagine that in the management of the cavalry on that day he was at all incautious, (and such I know there are), how little they understand his real character; as a proof of his intrepidity and the readiness with which he exposed himself, it is not necessary; to these qualities every one does justice.” [70]

Murray of the 18th Hussars wrote: “Seven o’clock must have been about the time”, and “the action was vehement at the moment…”, when “…Lord Uxbridge, in hussar uniform, mounted on a common troop-horse (his own being exhausted), rode with General Vivian a short time in our front.” [71]

Assuming, then, that this incident happened north and slightly west of La Haie-Sainte, with the air filled with smoke, and Alten’s Division under constant and heavy musketry and artillery fire and threatened by French cavalry, one might take a less generous view than Vivian of a second-in-command who exposes himself in such a manner at the height of battle.

Yet as Lieutenant-Colonel Cathcart, Lord Greenock, AQMG to the Cavalry, asserted:

“…as I accompanied Lord Anglesey on that occasion, I am able to vouch for the fidelity and accuracy with which all the circumstances relative to this visit of his Lordship's are described by Sir Hussey in that letter. On quitting Sir Hussey Vivian, Lord Anglesey joined the Duke of Wellington, and it was about this time that the last attack by the Enemy took place.” [72]

Vivian’s Task…

Shaw said that Vivian’s Brigade formed up:

“…in rear of that part of the position on which Kielmansegge's and Ompteda's stood, and which was now reinforced by the Brunswick and some of the Nassau troops;…” [73]

Shortly after the battle, Vivian wrote of his arrival: “I arrived in the rear of the Infantry just at the time that several small Squares of Foreign troops were giving way. In fact my wheeling into line in their rear and cheering them actually halted two of them, and gave them confidence.” [74]

Later he recalled: “…I arrived most opportunely, at the instant that Buonaparte was making his last and most desperate effort: and never did I witness anything so terrific: the ground actually covered with dead and dying, cannon shots and shells flying thicker than I ever heard even musketry before, and our troops – some of them – giving way.

In this state of affairs I wheeled my brigade into line close (within ten yards) in the rear of our infantry, prepared to charge the instant they had retreated through my intervals…My doing this, however, gave them confidence, and the brigade, which was literally running away, halted on our cheering them, and again began firing.” [75]

Siborne wrote to Vivian: “When, after having crossed the chaussée you moved forward and formed line in immediate rear of the Infantry with your left not far from that chaussée, the first column of the Imperial Guard (Grenadiers) had, I imagine, approached near to that part of our line occupied by the 1st Brigade of Guards.

This attack was supported on its own right by some Battalions from the 1st French corps, advancing from the hollow ground about La Haie Sainte, accompanied by some Guns, and preceded by a swarm of skirmishers. The Horse Artillery Battery which had at an earlier point established itself at near the angle of the little garden of La Haie Sainte, now advanced two guns to within 150 paces of the Hanoverian square (see Sketch), so that altogether the fire in your front at that moment must have been tremendous...” [76]

Siborne’s account in History continued:

“The Prince of Orange, Alten, and almost all the superior officers of the 3rd division, had been wounded. But Kielmansegge, who now commanded in this part of the field, was fully alive to the critical circumstances under which the 3rd division was placed, and exhibited great ability, coolness, and determination, by the manner in which he succeeded in restoring it to order.

Still, the persevering and incessant tiraillade kept up against these troops by the French was such, that the fire thrown out from their shattered and enfeebled ranks was quite inadequate to repress it. The French skirmishers again crowded close up to the line; maintaining a most rapid and destructive fire.

The Allied infantry was once more on the point of giving way. One battalion of the Brunswickers was retiring in close column, but in good order, having totally ex-hausted its ammunition. The Nassauers were falling back en masse against the horses' heads of the 10th hussars, who, keeping their files closed, prevented further retreat. Vivian and Captain Shakespeare of the 10th, (acting as his extra aide-de-camp.) rendered themselves conspicuous at this moment by their endeavours to halt and encourage the Nassauers. The Hanoverians and the German legion on the left, led by Kielmansegge, now resolutely dashed forward, at the double quick - their drums rolling. The enemy fell back.

The Brunswickers took up the movement, as then did also the Nassauers - Vivian and his aide-de-camp cheering them on; whilst the hussars followed in close support. In this manner, Kielmansegge succeeded in leading back the shattered remnants of the division to the place they had so long and so honourably occupied on the ridge.

Vivian’s brigade, by its proximity to these troops, against which so close and unremitting a fire of musketry was maintained, was placed in a very trying situation for cavalry, and suffered much in consequence. As soon, however, as the infantry had rallied and resumed their former position in the line, Vivian withdrew his brigade under the crest of the ridge, a distance of not more than thirty yards, to place his men a little out of fire; and when thus posted, he was better prepared to make an attack if required…” [77]

Writing in 1833, Vivian said that he supported some “foreign troops” at about the same time that Wellington is said to have rallied the Brunswickers:

“I notice a circumstance of the same sort that I witnessed on this part of the field, about the time mentioned, not to throw any doubt on the statement of the Duke having rallied those troops, but as it seems to point out exactly where the 6th brigade of cavalry was posted.

A battalion of foreign troops, with white covers to their shakos, fell back en masse against the horses’ heads of the 10th, and undoubtedly, had this regiment not been formed where it was, would have retreated. This was shortly after our arrival on the position.

Captain Shakespeare, of the 10th, was then standing with me in front of that regiment, and we both endeavoured to halt and encourage them; but it was their coming against the horses’ heads, and being unable to pass through the files, that did check them. I must, however, do their officers the justice to say I saw many attempts to stop them, and one seized a drummer by the collar, and made him beat the rally.

When halted, they faced about, moved twenty or thirty yards forward, and again began firing, which they kept up until the advance took place. The Duke must at this time have been just on the left of these troops; and probably this is the very battalion to which you refer as the one his Grace rallied.” [78]

Vivian was later persuaded that these troops were Nassauers, and Siborne mentioned Vivian’s account to Kruse of the Nassau service, as he wrote to Vivian in 1836:

“I had previously drawn Gen. Kruse’s attention to your remark about the white covers to the schakos, & in his reply he says “It is perfectly true that the 1st Regt. Nassau (3 battns. – his Brigade) wore white covers to the schakos and pouches, which, however, I caused to be taken off about 3 o’clock as they formed too good a mark for the enemy’s artillery.” [79]

Vivian responded tetchily, as if his testimony was in doubt, that “…I spoke to the P. of O. on the subject of the white [? unclear] shakos in my front & he said they were Nassauers…The only way to reconcile it is to suppose that some men must have disobeyed the order for taking them off...”; and, positively repeating his testimony of 1833, he ended: “That I will swear to.” [80]

But Murray of the 18th Hussars thought that his regiment had supported the Nassauers:

“What fell back upon the 10th except it might have been on its extreme left would not be seen by me at that period in front of the 18th. But I remember Lieutenant and adjutant Duperier’s urging forward from the front of the 18th some soldiers in a uniform green, blue or some dark colour, I think green, & as I also think with either white shakos or white shako-covers & buff belts.

For this reason I suppose that the Nassau Troops were posted between Colonel Ompteda’s brigade and the Hanoverian militia but more advanced from the position. Hence if they fell back it would be upon the 6th Brigade of cavalry.” [81]

Bacon of the 10th Hussars thought that his regiment had supported the Brunswickers:

“…[I] therefore did not see the Nassau troops giving way, but a column of the Brunswick infantry was stopped [going] to the rear, bent upon the interval between our right and centre squadrons; Lt. Arnold rode out upon their right flank with myself, and I have no doubt the officers of our centre squadron did the same upon the left, when the column faced about, and marched to the front….

What was passing in our front, was impossible to tell, for we could not see ten yards from us, but the shower of musket balls coming from the dense columns of smoke told of a formidable enemy close to us.” [82]

Lieutenant-Colonel Lord Manners of the 10th Hussars, in a letter to Vivian which was passed on to Siborne, recalled:

“…forming as a support in rear of the Infantry, a Battalion, or Brigade of Brunswickers being in the immediate front of the 10th Hussars. The attack of the Enemy at this point was exceedingly warm and spirited, and as they held at the same time the Farm of La Haye Sainte, also in our immediate front, the 10th suffered considerably; …

So furious indeed, & determined was the French assault, that at one time the Brunswickers gave way, and victory seemed almost within the grasp of the Enemy. This occasioned Sir Hussey Vivian’s brigade also to retire for some distance, which movement was performed with the greatest steadiness & regularity. The Brunswickers being rallied, advanced again in their turn, with loud shouts, & drums beating, supported by our brigade, & drove the French back…” [83]

Vivian annotated Manners’ account (and Manners accepted the correction [84]):

“The retreat was not 30 yards, & was made merely to get the men clear of the confusion & under the crest of the hill a little out of fire, as the losses were so great, and so posted the Brigade was just as ready to attack any of the Enemy that reached the top of the position as if posted there, and indeed it was better placed, for the attack would have been less expected. The movement was not made until the Brunswickers were rallied & had resumed firing.” [85]

In 1829 Captain Taylor of the 10th Hussars wrote a detailed and sometimes confused account, which Vivian passed to Siborne:

“…Here we saw the Infantry warmly engaged, and took open column after a little time, and, bringing up left shoulders, moved along the rear of the Infantry, and the Infantry being rather pushed by the Enemy, who kept up a heavy fire, we wheeled into line and supported, about fifty yards in rear of them; they rather fell back upon us, and one Battalion of Brunswick Oels in close column, retiring, being [in] want of ammunition, I believe, but in good order, was near passing through us between my squadron and Major Howard's. Just then two or three Battalions to the left of it advanced at double quick, their drums rolling, and drove back the Enemy. The Brunswick Oels faced about and advanced at the charge also, Sir H. Vivian and Captain Shakespeare, &c., cheering them on.

A cloud of tirailleurs being close up to our Infantry, behind which we were, and keeping up a heavy fire, we had many casualties here, particularly numbers of horses hit, some in two or three places…The men behaved with great steadiness in a position rather trying for Cavalry…” [86]

In 1836 Taylor explained to Siborne some points in his earlier account:

“…In what I described in the paper before sent, of a regiment of Brunswickers (I supposed them to be such from their dark uniform) being about to pass between two of our squadrons to the rear. When I stated Captain Shakespear (and as I still think) Sir Hussey Vivian spoke to them and cheered them to advance - I did not mean to say that our line was forced, but the French were evidently pushing much, and the fire was very heavy. I saw their men through the smoke apparently not 50 paces from our infantry and our regiment was in line close behind the infantry… …I should say there was rather musketry than grape on us when in line – and round shots from the sound…

…The troops I saw were as I have said above in a dark dress and looked like Brunswickers, they did not retire through the squadron intervals, but turned about and advanced again with other battalions to the left in a general rally, drums rolling: Lieutenant Duperier at the same time urging forward some troops of the same description corroborates my accounts. It was probably another battalion of the same force.” [87]

Clearly matters were highly confused, but it seems likely that the 18th Hussars, on the left, had the Nassauers to their front, while the 10th Hussars, to the right, were behind the Brunswickers. The Brunswickers were without doubt on the right (and to the left of Halkett’s Brigade). The accounts of the 1st Nassau Regiment stated that after the unsuccessful attack led by the Prince of Orange, the whole line withdrew, leaving the defence of the plateau in the hands of only weak bands of troops, and that Kruse joined onto these with the 2nd and 3rd Battalions of his regiment, close to the Brussels road; [88] their plugging of gaps in Ompteda’s and Kielmansegge’s positions is a plausible explanation of how the Nassauers came to be in front of the 18th Hussars.

In his own history of the campaign, Shaw commented: “The troops that gallantly and successfully secured this part of the position for the rest of the day, could not have been expected to make the stand which they did against such determined and protracted efforts of veteran French troops; they were only recent formations, and without experience in the field…

…this part of the line was so severely pressed by the continued, close, and persevering attacks of the enemy, that the support of Vivian's brigade at this point was of importance.” [89]

What might have happened if the final French attack had achieved a breakthrough against Alten’s Division must be left to the realms of speculation. Baring said that, by the end of the day, Alten’s Division was so crippled that it could not take part in the pursuit. [90]

It is remarkable that none of the reports of those troops mention the presence of Vivian’s Brigade.


Left Wing History (5) Vivian’s 6th (Light) Cavalry Brigade on the 18th June 1815

Left Wing History (4) Vivian’s 6th (Light) Cavalry Brigade on the 18th June 1815

Left Wing History (3) Vivian’s 6th (Light) Cavalry Brigade on the 18th June 1815

Left Wing History (2) Prussian I Corps

Left Wing History (1) Waterloo 1815: Vivian's 6th Cavalry Brigade


Back to Table of Contents -- First Empire # 80
Back to First Empire List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List
© Copyright 2005 by First Empire.
This article appears in MagWeb.com (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other articles from military history and related magazines are available at http://www.magweb.com