Refereed by Dean N. Essig
What follows is a set of two letters forwarded to me which are pro and con the CWB's handling of forest effects and Dave Powell's response to the con argument. Both letters were developed by players in response to Dave's article which appeared in OPS #1. I have endeavoured to reprint the letters faithfully, with editing limited to spelling and punctuation, to preserve the tone and structure of the originals. I will be happy to follow up the debate here with letters and articles submitted y others. However, I will be very quick to listen to the readership. The debate will only be useful if the readership wants to see it. If not, I cannot allow further space to be dedicated to its pursuit. Those ground rules laid, let the mud-slinging begin. Letters
Con: The CWB's Forest Treatment Pro: The CWB's Forest Treatment In Self Defense: Reply Back to Table of Contents -- Operations #5 Back to Operations List of Issues Back to MagWeb Master List of Magazines © Copyright 1992 by The Gamers. This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com |