by Louis Rotundo
Adolf Hitler's initial decision to begin preparations for an invasion of the USSR led the German eastern intelligence branch, Fremde Heeres Ost (FHO) to redouble its efforts to obtain information on the Red Army. Based upon this research, the operational planning for Case Barbarossa took shape during the winter of 1940. The initial estimates, however,
revealed a departure from past years
when the USSR usually appeared as
numerically dominant on the continent.
FHO believed that Russia no longer
possessed the enormous active military
resources of previous times. Its estimate
of 21 July 1940 stated that Russia
maintained only 50-75 good divisions
and would be defeated by a German force
of 80-100 divisions. Germany could
readily field this number despite
commitments in Western Europe and
Norway.
[2]
In August, General Erich Marcks, in
charge of formulating the initial invasion
study, revised his plan to incorporate the
latest information. Marcks postulated that
Russia would have available 96 infantry,
and 23 cavalry divisions as well as 28
mechanized brigades in its western
districts. These forces, he indicated, could
be defeated by a German force of 24
panzer, 12 motorized and 110 infantry
divisions.
Further, Marcks stated, FHO
believed Russia would not be able to
increase its strength appreciably by the
Spring of 1941, and little evidence existed
of a strong mobile reserve force.3
During the period Winter 1940 to
Spring 1941, FHO continually revised its
calculations regarding Soviet strength.
These estimates and their growth may be
seen in Table 1.
Uniformly, these estimates lagged
behind the actual changes in the Red
Army. This situation could probably be
anticipated given the secretive nature of
Soviet society and the limited intelligence
tools available to FHO. However, more
significant than the time lag remains the
crucial error in numbers. FHO consistently
miscalculated the size and strength of the
USSR, in varying degrees, until the
invasion. Actual Soviet strength is
discussed later, but briefly the problem
with FHO's estimates may be summarized
as follows: they omit the Russian cavalry
reductions, the reported divisional totals
are in error by one-third, and they
miscalculate the creation of new
mechanized corps and tank divisions.
After 22 June, FHO secured much better
information regarding Soviet frontline
strength. However, total estimates,
including reserves, reveals only a
marginal improvement when compared to
the historical record. For example, on 8
August, FHO estimated the Red Army
strength at 260 rifle, 50 tank, 20 cavalry,
and 60 other divisions. Organized Soviet
strength by that date actually totaled over
300 rifle, 70 tank, and about 61 cavalry
divisions. Yet perhaps the worst estimate
appeared on 1 December 1941.
No Soviet reserves had been
identified although twelve armies existed.
The FHO summation stated: "The
numerical strength of the majority of Soviet
combat units is low-, their equipment is
unsatisfactory. New units were appearing
with less frequency in recent days-,
individual units are being transferred from
quiet to endangered front sectors. On this
basis it should be assumed that no
significant strategic reserve units exist at
present .... The combat strength of the
enemy has been weakened decisively, as
a result of losses in personnel and
material which have surpassed all
expectations." These errors provided
ample reason for the terrible
miscalculations of the late Summer and
Fall.
[4]
More Russian Reserves in the
1941 Campaign
|