by John Prados
![]() |
The FLN dreams of capturing Tlemcen, a city of 50,000 on that border, and declaring it capital of a provisional government were destroyed. Perhaps in response to the French mobilization order, the ALN staged a massive raid into the Sournan valley, a pro-French area on the Tunisian border, on 22 April 1956. But increasingly, in order to outflank the intensified French efforts against the rural willayas, the FLN began to penetrate the Algerian cities. By 1956 the security situation at Algiers was so desperate that the French erected barricades and inspection points at all the entrances to the Moslem quarter of the Casbah in order to trap ALN terrorists in the French-patrolled downtown section of the city. FLN strength in Algiers alone was estimated at 4,000 men with numerous supporters and sympathizers. The French Command initially regarded mobilization as a panacea. For the first time the French would have sufficient forces to conduct extensive ground operations. Much was expected of the new French commander, General Raoul Salan, who was one of the few French generals in Indochina to come in through that experience with his reputation untarnished. In Algeria, Salan joined the many Paratroop, Legion, and Colonial Corps officers who were back from Indochina and had very strong ideas on how the Algerian War should be fought. The ability of Salan rested upon his willingness to allow these officers freedom of action while at the same time incorporating their activities into the framework of a pacification system for all Algeria. Salan developed this pacification system to an unprecedented degree of sophistication. The French system was organized at the lowest levels of Algerian society and then worked its way up. At the village level, or perhaps the ward level in the cities, functioned the SAS/SAU. SAS/SAU was an organization of military personnel (and civilians under contract) which specialized in civil affairs. In many villages, SAS officers constructed the first schools or market places that the villages had ever had. By 1959, over 4,000 SAS pesonnel operated 660 sections throughout Algeria. The SAS program of civil-military relations was combined also with a more conventional program of military self-defense. In essence, villages which pledged their loyalty to the French could receive weapons with which to equip local villagers as village guards. The French, for their part, made strenuous efforts to ascertain the real loyalties of a given village before distributing arms to it. While this program started very early in the war, before Salan took over the command, only about 3,200 rifles had been given to villages (thus there were probably less than a hundred villages participating). It was under Salan, and his successor General Maurice Challe, that 1,840 villages were armed (66-75% of the number the French considered necessary for the total pacification of Algeria). Combined with these programs of civil affairs and village self-defense was a massive resettlement campaign. Of the Algerian population of 9,500,000, about one million lived in the urban areas along the Mediterranean coast. The population of the bled, or mountains and deserts far to the south of the coastal plain, was relatively small, largely loyal to the FLN, and relatively impervious to French penetration because of the lack of roads and airfields. These Moslems were largely ignored. There remained about eight million people in the rural areas of the north coastal plain in which the French concentrated their operations. The French considered that small villages could be moved, concentrated into much larger settlements, and placed in French security zones so as to eliminate FLN influence in the villages. In the course of the Algerian War this resettlement effort moved upwards of two million people, or a fourth of the entire rural population. At the same time, the population, both urban and rural, was further controlled by the institution of new indentification methods and constant identity checks designed to prevent FLN infiltration into the villages and cities. Salan combined these methods of controlling the population and winning its loyalty with a more conventional system of military pacification. The first consideration was to eliminate effective outside support for the FLN. In this connection the French blocked off both the Moroccan and Tunisian borders, placing three full Army divisions on the Tunisian border and building a defense line, the Morice Line, along the Tunisian frontier. Naval vessels patrolled the Algerian coast in order to prevent steamers from slipping in and unloading supplies. Within Algeria, taking off from the attempt to isolate the ALN from outside support, the French used the famed 'oil slick' (quadrillage) method. The newly mobilized regiments coming to Algeria in 1956 were used to occupy the main towns and communication routes. Since, in many cases, these same routes marked the boundaries of the ALN willaya command zones, the quadrillage system had the effect of making communication between willayas more difficult, as well as posing an additional obstacle to ALN troops infiltrated across the border and trying to reach their operational areas. French troop requirements for this system of territorial occupation were quite large. On the Tunisian border, the Morice Line tied up some 80,000 soldiers. The Moroccan border was occupied by another 60,000 men. Nonetheless, it was the quadrillage which used up the majority of French manpower, for use of the quadrillage required about 200,000 troops, in effect every additional soldier of whom the French disposed after the 19S6 mobilication. It was the units left over after these requirements had been met, typically the best Legion, Paratroop, and Naval Infantry units, which were used as intervention forces for ground operations against the FLN. For most of the war the intervention forces constituted about one tenth of the total French manpower in Algeria.
Even more important than regular French forces in the formations of the intervention forces was the strength level of native Algerians serving with the French. Salan had realized the value of native troops in his last year in Indochina (1953) and in Algeria he was the first French commander to make an extensive, sustained effort to organize Algerian auxiliary units for service with the French. Aside from special Algerian units serving particular areas or particular French units, there were three main types of Algerian auxiliaries. First were the harkas, regarded as field troops, who numbered 58,000 by 1960. Then there were the makhzan, Algerians who worked directly with the SAS/SAU on town and village security and numbered 19,000 by 1960. Finally there were the mobile security groups (GMS) which worked along police lines and had 8,500 men in 1960. Yet, even at peak strength and including all the Algerian regular regiments with the French Army, Algerian manpower never numbered more than 115,000 soldiers. In the end the French, conscious of the necessity of recruiting Algerians to the French cause and using sophisticated propaganda and information techniques to do so, motivated only a little over one per cent of the Algerians to fight for them. This compared unfavorably with Indochina, in which the French were served by 1.5% of the Indo-chinese, and it is generally conceded that in Indochina the French were unsuccessful in motivating natives to fight for their cause. Much of the French failure to get Moslem loyalties in Algeria could be traced directly to the French aim of retaining Algeria as part of France. In this context, the French could not promise Algerians independence if France won the war, and French efforts to convince the Moslems that the FLN were communists, were largely unsuccessful. Thus, in a depressed, overpopulated country, many Algerians undoubtedly served for the sake of regular pay and rations; their presence facilitated FLN infiltration, and they complicated the overall picture. Their reliability was not above suspicion, and planning had to take this into account. Though many auxiliaries distin guished themselves in combat, the ten dency was to use them rather for recon naissance, for guard, supply, and transport duties. (Paret, 41) The inability of the French to raise Algerian units of high combat value placed limitations on the number and types of units which the French could utilize for intervention forces. This gave the French few choices in the selection of tactics for use in ground operations. Essentially, the French sought to compensate for lack of manpower by using intervention units of high quality combined with extensive supporting firepower and mobility. The monthly level of air sorties, by March 1957, had increased to 10,000, and through to the end of the war the French maintained about 400 combat aircraft in Algeria. In the quest for mobility the French began to use airmobile tactics extensively. In fact, the airmobiles assault replaced the reliance the French had put in parachute drops during the Indochina War. By 1960 the French had some 380 troop-carrier (H-14 and Vertol-21), 25 medium (S-55 and H-19), and over 200 light (Alouette) helicopters in Algeria. It was quite common for a paratroop unit, for example, to spend several days fighting FLN incursions along the Tunisian border and then to be immediately shifted 950 kilometers to rectify a deteriorating situation along the Moroccan side of Algeria. However, the French could not concentrate forces for divisional and corpssized operations without withdrawing their quadrillage net in some other part of Algeria, and the slowness of concentration almost always tipped off the ALN to what was going on. Consequently, few such operations were attempted, and the French persisted in using their intervention forces in reaction operations and search and destroy missions against reported ALN forces. Yet in spite of their deficiencies in native forces and offensive tactics, the French strategy in Algeria managed to combine fairly effectively most of the techniques then considered necessary to combat a guerrilla movement.
|