Defense of the
Dutch Republic 1793

Dutch During the
Revolutionary Wars Part 11

British Attack and French Retreat

by Geert van Uythoven, Netherlands

The British Night Attack

During the following night, Lieutenant J.C. Koff, commanding a gaffelaar on its post opposite Noordschans, detected some movement in the harbour of this village. Not known by him, this movement was caused by a strong French force arriving from the fortress-city Klundert. This force was send after the report was received that the Dutch were trying to land troops at the Noordschans. This report was of course false, probably caused by the transport fleet destined for Willemstad passing by, and the engagement between some of its escorts and the guns at Noorschans.

To find out more about the movement he had seen, Lieutenant Koff carefully approached Noordschans, to have a better look. Suddenly he was fired upon by some guns from the French battery there, which was believed to be abandoned. Not knowing what to expect, Kolf set more sail, to be able to manoeuvre quicker. At the same moment, more guns were fired, and much to his surprise some gunboats closed in on the battery, exchanging a lively fire, and apparently trying to land troops!

The French replied, with guns and heavy musketry, and the gunboats had to retreat out of range before they had reached the river bank. Lieutenant Koff made contact with the gunboats, learning that it were Captain Berkeley's eight British gunboats. British losses were a Lieutenant Western killed, and another officer and a sailor wounded. Kolf thought that the British were lucky with so few losses, taking in account the heavy French musketry.

Next day, Vice-Admiral van Kinsbergen received a report from Captain Berkeley about what had happened. Berkeley wrote that he had been executed a reconnaissance to Noordschans. When his forward gunboats had reached the harbour entrance, they were fired upon with cannon and muskets. he replied with gunfire and musketry of his own, but was not able to execute a landing because of the heavy French fire. Therefore, he found it necessary to retreat, but not before he had silenced the enemy fire. Further, he wrote that Lieutenant Webster was killed, and another one of his officers and a sailor wounded.

Vice-Admiral van Kinsbergen replied to Captain Berkeley that he was sorry that the expedition had failed, but added that Berkeley at least should have informed him about the undertaking he had planned. As it was now, Berkeley acted without orders, and the whole riverfront was alarmed by Berkeley's expedition, with the Dutch not knowing what was happening!

In addition, the attack was badly executed, and could well have led to the loss of several gunboats. Why decided Captain Berkeley to undertake this 'reconnaissance', as he called it himself, without any orders? Well, that is any one's guess. Possibly he wanted a more active role for the British naval forces. Or he wanted to earn some glory for himself. As it was now, he was lucky the Dutch did not dare to compromise the fresh and feeble alliance with the British, by condemning Berkeley for his unauthorised action.

The French Retreat

Things were going badly wrong for the French. When hearing of the Austrian advance in the east, General Dumouriez initially did not want to give up the conquest of the Dutch Republic. But after being forced by the Convention on 8 March, he to give up his plans and had to defend Belgium. Dumouriez finally handed over command of the troops in the Dutch Republic to Mar6chal de Camp De Flers. De Flers received orders from Dumouriez to continue with the plans, and to execute a crossing, while Durnouriez would hold the Austrians and Prussians at bay. But not surprisingly, De Flers hesitated.

On 18 March, Dumouriez lost the battle of Neerwinden. In order not to be cut off, the French troops in the Dutch Republic had to retreat south. On 22 March, the French evacuated Noordschans and the fortress-city Klundert completely, after having demolished the latters' defence works.

Gradually, the French retreated further south, abandoning more and more of the occupied Dutch territory. And gradually, Dutch troops crossed the Hollandsch Diep and occupied the abandoned French positions. As can be imagined, French discipline collapsed during the retreat and the Dutch population suffered much from the badly behaving and plundering soldiers. Especially the village Rucphen was thoroughly plundered. The city Roosendaal feared to suffer the same fate, and asked for protection to the governor of Bergen op Zoom, who, with the French threat disappeared, dispatched six hundred men to Roosendaal for protection. It would go to far, and would not be very interesting, to describe these events in detail.

It is time to have a look to what had happened in the eastern part of the Dutch Republic and Belgium, were important events had been taken place. But that will be the subject of the next parts of this series.

Next part: The Prussians and Austrians counterattack: the battles of Aldenhoven and Swalmen

Bibliography

Aa, Cornelis van der Geschiedems van den jongst-geendigden oorlog, tot op her sluiten van den vrede te Amiens, bijzonder met betrekking tot de Bataafsche Republiek (Amsterdam 1802)
Bas, F. dePrins Frederik der Nederlanden en zijn tij part I (Schiedam 1887)
Blanchard, Pierre Histoire des battailles, sieges et combats des Francais, depuis 1792 jusqu'en 1815 (Paris 1818)
Brown, Robert An impartial journal of a detachment from the Brigade of Foot Guards, commencing 25th February, 1793, and ending 9th May, 1795 (London 1795)
Chuquet, Arthur Les guerres de la revolution - Tome V: La Trahison de Dumouriez (Paris 1887)
Cruyplants, Eugene Dumouriez dans les Ci-Devant Pays-Bas Autrichiens Vol. II (Bruxelles /Paris 1912)
Colenbrander Prof. Dr. H.T. Gedenkstukken der algemeene geschiedenis van Nederland van 1795 tot 1840 Iste deel (Nederland en de Revolutie 1789 1795)(Den Haag 1905)
Dumouriez, General Memoires du General Dumouriez, Ecrits par lui-meme (Hambourg et Leipzig, 1794)
Es, N.J.A.P.H. van Het Historisch Museum van het Korps Rijdende Artillerie Vol. I (Arnhem, 1898)
Fortesque, JW. British Campaigns in Flanders, 1690-1794 (London 1918)
Geisweit van der Netten, kol. Officiele rapporten betrekkelijk de krijgsverrichtingen der H. troepen in de veldtogten van 1793 tot 95 tegen de Franschen in de O. Nederlanden (s.l., s.d.)
Hoeufft, Mr. J.D. Beschryvinge van het gebeurde ten tyde van den inval der Franschen in ons land, benevens de middelen van defensie, aangewend door den Ridder J.H. van Kinsbergen (Amsterdam 1794)
Jong, Mr. J.C. de Geschiedenis van het Nederlandsche zeewezen dl 6, le stuk ('s Gravenhage & Amsterdam 1845)
Naber, Johanna W.A. Correspondentie van de stadhouderlijke familie 1777-1795 Dl. I (1777-1793)('s Gravenhage 1931)
Nispen, Const. van Beleg en verdediging van Willemstad in 1793 (Willemstad 1993)
Oldenborgh, J.P. van De oorlogs-vaartuigen en canonneer chalouleen, ter defensie van de limen van Zuid-Holland en het Hollandsch Diep (Amsterdam 1793)
Prokesch-Osten, Ritter Anton Kleine Schriften 1: Der Feldzug in den Niederlanden 1793 (Stuttgart 1842)
Prud'homme van Reine, R.B. Jan Hendrik van Kinsbergen 1735-1819 - admiraal en filantroop (Amsterdam 1990)

Footnotes

[1] Part 5 and 6 of the series have appeared in First Empire No. 56 and 57 (Jan/Feb and Mar/Apr 2001).
[2] When it was thought there were enough Dutch ships pres ent, the British ships left. See for more this article, the defence of Zeeland.
[3] As already has been described in a previous article, the 'patriots' sympathised with the French and their revolutionary ideas. The patriot party was very strong in the Dutch Republic.
[4] Strengths and positions of I March 1793. The number and origin of the gunners serving the batteries is unknown.
[5] Maximal strength was reached half March. One has to keep in mind, that when hostilities began, strength was much weaker.
[6] The Dutch used two kinds of gunboats in their defence: The ,single gunboats' were manned with twenty men and armed with one 18-pdr gun in the bow; the 'double gunboats' were manned with 24 men and aimed with two 18-pdr guns, one in the bow, the other one in the back of the boat. These gunboats were an invention from equipagemeester William May, and were converted from boats which were propelled by oars, as well as a sail.
[7] A "gaffelaar" or "gaffelschip" is a small kind of yacht.
[8] As has been described in part 6 of the series (First Empire No. 57, Mar/Apr 2001), the British Captain Berkeley, as proposed by the British ambassador, formed a squadron of eighteen gunboats, hired or bought by the British in the Dutch republic, armed with guns taken from the Dutch arsenals, and manned with British sailors taken from the British warships present.
[9] For details on the capture of Geertruidenberg, see part 8 of the series, which has appeared in First Empire No. 60 (Sep/Oct 2001)
[10] Part 6 of the series appeared in First Empire No. 57 (Mar/Apr 2001)
[11] Sources slightly differ sometimes about the amount of guns each ship was armed with. I have noted the most probable armament, using the most reliable sources.
[12] For some more details about the French squadron on the Scheldt, see part 6 of the series, which appeared in First Empire No. 57 (Mar/Apr 2001).
[13] The "La St. Lucie" was found to be armed with three 24-pdr guns, four swivel guns, and a furnace to prepare redhot ball.

Defense of the Dutch Republic 1793 Dutch in Revolutionary Wars Part 11

The Dutch During the Revolutionary Wars


Back to Table of Contents -- First Empire #64
Back to First Empire List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List
© Copyright 2002 by First Empire.
This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com