By Russ Lockwood
As usual for ancient events, we are limited in the number of sources recording eye-witness observations. That anything exists after over 2,000 years is amazing in itself, but sadly, just about everything is lost to us, though we know of contemporary authors because they are quoted in histories compiled years later. Some archeological evidence has been unearthed, and there is a matching of the geological and geographical descriptions mentioned by the ancient authors. It is, of course, still a considerable amount of guesswork, hence the continuing and conflicting ideas about the actual route. Contemporary Sources Socilos (also Socylos) was a Greek who taught the Greek language to Hannibal and later wrote a biography of Hannibal. The biography is lost, but referenced. Silenos (also Silenus) was a Greek who accompanied the Carthanginian army and later wrote an "official history" of sorts. His writings were translated by Lucius Coelius Antipater, who in turn is quoted by Livy and Cicero. Of the history, it is lost, but, again, referenced. Lucius Cincius Alimentus was a Roman prisoner who learned of troop losses allegedly from Hannibal. He wrote no book, but is quoted by Livy. Historians Polybius originally wrote 40 books on the history of the Rome circa 220-145BC, but most are lost. However, volumes I-V survive complete, much of VI, and fragments of the rest. As for this particular topic, he made a journey over the Alps approximately 60 years after Hannibal's crossing. Livy wrote an astounding 142 volume history, of which only 35 survive, including 10 on the Second Punic War (Books 21 to 30). His description of events is, at times, suspect, but voluminous and dramatic. Ammianus Marcellinus quotes Timagenes regarding various tribal information. Silius Italicis is a poet, not historian per se, but his work can be used to doublecheck Livy on occasion. Appian, a generally unreliable historian Various Fragments Letter from Servius
Altogether Altogether, these sources offer a glimpse into the maneuverings of Hannibal during the autumn and winter of 218BC when the Carthaginian commander led his forces out of Spain and into Italy. They also offer tantalizing details of the march which should, in theory, be relatively straightforward to match to today's geographical features. It all boils down to reconstructing the route by reconciling time, distance, and geological features. Alas, one scholar's perfect ambush spot in a gorge is another's geological impossibility, and one river can duplicate much of the same distance information as another. Indeed, one modern author contends the ancient historians count days from the last "event," rather than consecutively, which adds days and thus, the radius of possible pass sites. Another contends that copying errors through the last two millennia insert different meanings to key places and events. Nevertheless, to start Hannibal's march is to start with our two most available sources: Polybius and Livy. Hannibal Crosses the Alps A Route Examined and a Proposed Alternate Route
Survey of Classical Sources Hannibal's March According to the Histories of Polybius and Livy Polybius vs. Livy: Debate over Hannibal's March Modern Historians: Route Acceptance and Rejection Modern Historians: Rhone Crossing Modern Historians: The Island Modern Historians: From the Island to The Ascent of the Alps Modern Historians: Ascent to the Alps to the Pass Polybius vs. Livy: Short Bios Hannibal's Line of March Considerations: Proposing a Route Hannibal's March: A Proposed Alternate Route Conclusion and Bibliography Back to War Lore: The List Back to Master Magazine List © Copyright 2002 by Russ Lockwood. This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com |