edited by the EE&L Staff
Note from Editor. We have here another updated reprint of an old EE&L article (EE&L 67, pp.11-12, October 1982) concerning the number of battalions of the Middle Guard attacking at Waterloo. The article was motivated by a reader challenging Paddy Griffith's statement in Forward into Battle that Napoleon launched an attack with 6 battalions of the Guard. The reader claimed: ".... In truth, the route of the Imperial Guard at Waterloo is the most confused and disrupted action in all these wars. There is not even agreement as to which and how many battalions of the Guard were involved.... " Indeed, the attack of the Middle Guard at Waterloo was a confused affair but the number of battalions and which battalions were involved is known if one takes the trouble to consult reliable French sources and Paddy Griffith was right. [1]
To determine the number of battalions involved in the attack we used two primary sources [2] and compared them with other reliable sources [3] using documents from the French Archives at Vincennes (returns, etc.). According to these sources, the battalions involved in the attack were:
So, we have 5 battalions all of which were part of the Middle Guard (6, if you count 2 battalions for the 4th Chasseurs).
We can safely claim that any narratives asserting otherwise or that a greater number of battalions took part in the attack are in error and misleading. Furthermore, it is easy to verify the above two sources by accounting for the location of all 14 battalions of the Old and Middle Guard present at Waterloo at the time of the attack.
At the time of the attack the remaining 9 Guard battalions were located as follows:
We believe the question to be resolved. We strongly recommend that the readership maintain an open mind and investigate what really took place by consulting some other sources reputed for their reliability. In investigating Waterloo, one must also consult reliable Belgian, Dutch, French and Prussian sources in addition to British sources.
If the reader thinks we exaggerate that many sources are in error and misleading, take a look at what follows.
As late as 1967, a historian [4] wrote the following in a footnote perpetuate the myth and mentions: "Authorities do not agree as to the number and identity of these battalions, nor do they see eye-to-eye on formations or the places struck. I have followed a consensus of opinion as to major details and my own conjectures in small matters."
So, here we have the state of mind of some historians who do not rely on primary sources, or sources from the other side.
"... The Duke from his position above Hougoumont saw through his telescope a single column of seven battalions of the Old and Middle Guard advancing one behind the other, each in a short column with a front of two companies. A six-company battalion so formed would have been 60 files broad by nine ranks deep. Close up tight - the expression then was "close column' - each battalion would have been only eight yards deep. But the battalions undoubtedly had their companies separated from each other by about either 24 or 12 yards, at 'half" or 'quarter distance' as it was called.... etc."
Then follows a lengthy discussion on the space such formation would have occupied and a discussion on the column advancing. In our opinion, such a discussion is fine as it tries to inform. However, there are several basic problems and the description ends up misleading and misinforming the reader on what took place because it is based on false assumptions:
In our opinion, such narratives are unfortunate. Furthermore, the entire exercise on the space the 7-battalion formation occupied becomes an exercise in futility because there never were 7 battalions in the attack. In the end, one ends up with a gravely misleading narrative and a misrepresentation of the facts.
It is interesting to note that of the 21 battalions of the French Imperial Guard
Infantry at Waterloo, 12 are facing the Prussians, four are in Reserve behind La
Haye Sainte, and five are assaulting the center of the Anglo-Allied line between
Hougoumont and La Haye Sainte.
Source: Numbers drawn From Anthony Linck's Napoleon's Generals: The
Waterloo Campaign (see review in EE&L#10) based on his Archival
research at Vincennes.
More Waterloo
This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. |