'Ces Pauvres Enfants'

Napoleon's Marie-Louises Of 1814

Introduction and Conscription

by Major A. W. Field


INTRODUCTION

In the two years prior to 1814, in the terrible retreat from Russia and the debacle of the Campaign in Germany, the Grande Armee had suffered catastrophic losses. The energy and singlemindedness that Napoleon had shown in raising a new Grande Armee after Russia had been nothing short of miraculous. For the Campaign in Germany he fielded an army of well over 400,000 men, which despite its losses in the battles that led up to the Armistice in June 1813, numbered over 437,000 men by mid August.

Despite their impressive numbers however, a large proportion of these troops were hastily trained and often poorly led conscripts, many called up before their due date. The cataclysmic defeat at Leipzig and the subsequent retreat to France saw this army reduced to just 74,800 effectives - a loss of 83% in only 90 days. [2]

As 1814 approached, Napoleon once again faced the prospect of raising a new army to face the 250,000 largely veteran allied troops which were massing on France's Northern borders. These had another 150,000 echelonedbehind them! Napoleon had already gone some way to exhausting France's manpower pool the previous year, including the call-up of 90,000 men who would not have been eligible until 1814: he had therefore already started mortgaging France's future resources.

The thousands of immature teenagers who were hastily called to the Eagles were to be known as Marie- Louises and by their courage and fortitude were to earn themselves a glorious chapter in France's military history.

The aim of this article is to examine the raising, training and performance of these young men and also perhaps to expose a few myths which have grown up around them.

CONSCRIPTION IN THE FRENCH ARMY

The Revolution had seen France become the first modern army to introduce universal military service; the famous Levee en Masse. This was enshrined in Jourdan's Conscription Laws of 1798 on which were based the Imperial Legislation of following years. Under these laws all men between the ages of 18 and 40 were expected to register, and those between 18 and 25 (subsequently 30) were liable for call-up by the drawing of lots until sufficient men were found. Conscription was to be limited to unmarried men and childless widowers. The total manpower available each year was known as a 'class' of that particular year. In 1805 Napoleon secured for himself the power to fix the proportion of each class that was to be called to the Eagles.

This allowed him to call-up men not only from the due class, but also those before their due date and to draw repeatedly on those classes who had already contributed to the army. It is no surprise that after Napoleon's great victories of 1805-7, military service became increasingly unpopular and the numbers of 'refractaires' (those deliberately avoiding service) rose steeply.

It must be pointed out however, that even during the punishing drafts of 1813 and 1814 the number of men actually serving did not exceed 41 % of the eligible male population. [2]

The. conditions governing the drawing of lots, which took place in each commune, was strictly laid down in legislation. It must have been an atmospheric event filled with tension and a certain amount of nervous excitement. Families would accompany the prospective conscripts, all no doubt praying to avoid the call-up. The draw would be administered by local officials and supervised by gendarmes and military recruiting officers. A numbered ballot for each eligible man was placed into an urn and each potential recruit drew one. If the man was not present then the Mayor drew for him. The drawn number was announced by the subprefect and the higher the number the better the conscript's chance of not being included in the number of recruits that the commune was required to furnish.

Those who were unlucky enough to draw a low number were then given a rudimentary medical. If they passed this and were over 1.54m they were fit to serve. A conscript declared fit to serve could only escape officially by paying a substitute. This could be a very costly affair, the price varying between regions and the military situation from year to year. A formal contract was drawn up between the parties and the cost, generally between 1,500 and 4,000 Francs, was often paid in installments. if the substitute was killed then the conscript had only 14 days in which to find another. In the later years of the wars it is no surprise to find that the pool of potential substitutes was ever diminishing and the price beyond the means of many peasants.

There were of course a number of illegal ways of avoiding service; the two most common were desertion and self-mutilation. Unsurprisingly, absconding became more prevalent as the wars went on; sometimes individuals were hidden by family or friends from the gendarmes whose responsibility it was to round them up. However, as the number of 'refractaires' grew, so they formed bands who lived in the forests or mountains, turned to robbery to survive and encouraged others to join them rather than serve. Selfmutilation included the amputation of fingers or thumbs so individuals were unable to hold a musket or the breaking of the front teeth so they were unable to tear open a cartridge.

THE CONSCRIPTION OF LATE 1813 AND 1814

In order to concentrate wholly on military operations whilst he was on campaign in Germany in 1813, Napoleon entrusted the government of France to his wife, the young Marie-Louise, assisted by a Council of Regency directed by Cambaceres. The Decree calling the new conscripts to the Eagles was therefore signed by her and it is for this reason that these young soldiers were known as Marie-Louises.

From early in October 1813 (even before Leipzig) Napoleon issued a series of Senatus Consulte calling for the raising of new conscripts. If these had all been reallsed they would have produced 936,000 men under arms. However, there would prove to be only sufficient time, political will and equipment to deploy between 120 and 175,000 men to the various armies before the war ended in April the following year.

The first levy in Autumn 1813 called for 160,000 men from the classes of 1808-14: ironically 184,000 reported! The second levy called for 150,000 from the class of 1815 (ie 18 year olds). This levy also met little resistance except in the more Royalist departments where it was not pushed too hard. Anyway, by this time the administrative services, recruiting stations, clothing factories and arsenals were unable to cope with the influx of such numbers. Even this levy did not all find its way to the front before the fighting was over.

However, Napoleon then called for a third levy of 300,000 men, these were to come from the classes of 1800-07 for the second time, 1808, 1813 and 1814 for the third time and 1809-12 for the fourth time! It is hardly surprising that this final levy met substantial resistance from all parts of the country as it forced some areas to conscript supporters of families and even some married men. It is reported that only some 63,000, of the 300,000 called for, actually reported and it is doubtful if any of these had been processed before Napoleon's abdication. As if this was not enough, married and older men were still liable for service with the National Guard, although this organisation experienced even more problems in equipping and training the few men that answered the call.

The Allied invasion of France in 1814 struck terror into the hearts of the French, but initially at least there seemed little public will to resist. The nation was clearly weary of war and wished for peace. However, this apathy, particularly, in the districts which were occupied or directly threatened by the invasion, was quick to be dispelled as stories of the behaviour of the Allied armies began to circulate.

The poor discipline of the allied troops, however understandable, motivated the populace into action. Regrettably for Napoleon, this spontaneous reaction of the occupied areas came too late: the damage done by the initial apathy, particularly the reaction to the punishing levies, could not be repaired in time.

After the general compliance of the early drafts, public feeling against those that followed became increasingly aggressive. Many officials put off as long as possible the enforcement of the conscription and when put under pressure carried it out without energy. In some departments the drawing of lots was the signal for a riot and in Toulouse a notice appeared threatening to hang the first man who came forward to draw his number.

No one seemed willing to serve and the later conscriptions made slow progress. The registers proved faulty and out of date and despite the gendarmes, bailiffs and mobile columns, the numbers of defaulters and deserters rapidly increased. The forests filled with those avoiding the draft and bands of up to a thousand young men formed in various departments. These were able to arm themselves and there were skirmishes with the local troops and gendarmes. A detachment of conscripts from the Lower Seine started from there 177 strong but arrived at the training depot with only 35. [4]

It seemed that the only ones who stayed with the later drafts were those who had either not dared or been able to follow the deserters. Substitutes became beyond the means of all but the well-off and almost impossible to find even if the money was available.

Stories began to circulate; a detachment of infantry crossing the bridge over the Gironde at Bordeaux had thrown their arms into the river, others said "at the first shot we shall go over to the enemy" [5]

But most of these type of stories are unsubstantiated and were probably spread by Royalists who became more overt in their opposition to Napoleon. Not everyone was against the Emperor; whilst the upper classes blamed him for not making peace, many of the working classes still supported him and did not necessarily blame him for the war. To many of them he still seemed invincible, despite his defeats.

In his book The Campaigns of Napoleon David Chandler claims that "mere boys of 15 or 16 found themselves carrying muskets". Records show that no one from the classes of 1816 or 17 were called up so it is unlikely that anyone of this age was serving against his will. However, it is possible that boys of that age volunteered for service, particularly from those departments that had been ravaged and occupied, or threatened by the allies. Napoleon also called up for service some of the Pupilles; made up from the orphans of soldiers killed on campaign these were brought up in a military environment, well trained and probably had more combat value, than many of the older conscripts. Only the depot battalion with the youngest Pupilles--13 to 16 years--was in Paris when the Allies attacked the capital, Marshal Moncey found these youngsters reluctant to stop fighting and even when ordered to withdraw they cried "just one more shot." [6]

However unwilling the conscripts were when they drew their number or left their family behind, there can be little doubt from the reports on their performance that for many their, attitude changed as time went by. Many were from small,, forgotten, dirty villages and bleak city slums, Illiterate and completely ignorant of the world. They had been poor, ill-fed on little but bread and potatoes, and overworked at monotonous, sometimes dangerous work. So, despite the lack of equipment, food and training, the appalling weather and the rigours of campaign, each step away from their previous life and closer to the nervous excitement of action, the need to protect La Patrie, the comradeship of a shared, adventure land the magic of the Emperor, combined to generate a courage and motivation that no one, except perhaps Napoleon, could have reasonably expected.

From all this evidence it is clear that the levies made for the campaign in France were extremely unpopular and widely evaded, particularly later on. But we must be wary of tarring all the conscripts with the same brush, for many of them fought with outstanding fortitude and courage in the most trying of conditions.

'Ces Pauvres Enfants': Napoleon's Marie-Louises Of 1814 by Major A. W. Field


Back to Table of Contents -- Age of Napoleon #32
Back to Age of Napoleon List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List
© Copyright 1999 by Partizan Press.
This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com