Lend Lease Armored Fighting Vehicles and Motor Transport
by Winston Hamilton
Lend-Lease Armored Fighting VehiclesThe Soviets have always denigrated the quality of the tanks sent through Lend-Lease with the exception of the Sherman. In the case of most British tanks this is appropriate, but they did refuse the British offers of more modern Cromwell tanks in favor of continued deliveries of obsolescent Valentines. The British wished to discontinue production of the Valentine, but kept the lines going strictly for the benefit of the Soviets. Another point often ignored by the Soviets is the proportion of Allied production represented by the Lend-Lease tanks. Britain sent some 14% of its total tank production to the USSR, much of it in 1941 and 1942, when its own forces in the Middle East desperately needed tanks. Virtually all of Canada's AFV production ended up in the Soviet Union. Many of these vehicles arrived in the first year and a half of the war when they were sorely needed to supplement Soviet production which was still gearing up. One characteristic of Western AFVs that is little discussed by the Soviets was that the reliability of Western tanks allowed them to drive on long past the time that Soviet tanks had to be returned to the factory for a total mechanical rebuild. Soviet vehicles were purposely designed with short mechanical lifetimes. In combat this mattered little when the life expectancy of a tank was measured in days. But in training units the reliability of Western tanks was a godsend since they needed far less maintenance than Soviet tanks. Even in combat units this characteristic was useful; why else would 1st Guards Mechanized Corps convert from the T-34-85 to the Sherman, a tank with a smaller gun and thinner armor? Many of the lighter Western tanks, such as Valentines and Stuarts, equipped units in lieu of the Soviet's own light tanks. This allowed them to discontinue production of light tanks in the autumn of 1943.
Abbreviations: GMC, Gun Motor Carriage (tank destroyers), MGMC, Multiple Gun Motor Carriage (motorized AA guns on halftrack chassis).
Motor TransportEven more important than AFVs were the jeeps and trucks supplied by the West. Soviet trucks were copies of U.S. 1930era designs and lacked the cross-country abilities of the modern vehicles given by the Americans. The U.S. alone gave some 151,000 1 1/2 ton and 201,000 2 1/2 ton trucks. The table below compares Soviet truck production with Lend-Lease deliveries. Trucks production and lend-lease
1942: 35.0 1943: 49.2 1944: 60.6 1945: 74.7 Total: 281.5 Allied Deliveries: 409.5 Total: 691.0 Allied Proportion: 59.3% Note: Figures for 1941 are for the second half of the year only. On May 1, 1945 Lend-Lease vehicles comprised 32.8% of the Red Army's vehicle park. 9.1% were captured vehicles and 58.1% were domestically built. I can only explain the disparity between the Lend-Lease deliveries and the figures for May 1945 by suggesting that most of the Allied trucks were sent to the front where they were lost to enemy action while the Soviet trucks spent their time relatively safe in the rear because of their poor crosscountry abilities. These trucks enabled the Soviets to mount the offensives that evicted the Nazis from their territory and took Berlin. Without them they would have had to divert tank production to the manufacture of trucks. Undoubtedly this would have prolonged the war in the East, but not changed the outcome. More Soviet Armaments Factories
Tube Artillery Lend Lease Artillery, Mortars, and Rocket Artillery Ammunition, Lend Lease Ammunition and Explosives Armor, Armored Fighting Vehicles and Tank Factories Lend Lease Armored Fighting Vehicles and Motor Transport Soviet Factories and Europa Back to Europa Number 58 Table of Contents Back to Europa List of Issues Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List © Copyright 1997 by GR/D This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com |