Staff Officers
by Stuart Reid
General officers might be Field Marshals, Generals, Lieutenant Generals, or Major-Generals in descending order of precedence. At right, British staff officers (1814 Hamilton Smith series)[National Army Museum] The junior rank of Brigadier General was also conferred from time to time, but like its naval equivalent of Commodore, this was invariably a local promotion and usually quite transient. No particular duties attached to any of them; a Lieutenant General might command a division or its equivalent, while a Major General might have a brigade, but this was a very shaky rule of thumb and there was in fact no requirement for a general officer to be employed at all. Staff officers proper fell into three sometimes overlapping categories. These comprised the Quartermaster General's Department, the Adjutant General's Department, and Personal Staff Officers. Some posts had originally been purchasable, but this was entirely squeezed out during the 1790s and instead almost all posts were filled by selection - or rather by patronage since in practice there was no objective assessment system. There were in fact very few qualifications demanded of staff officers. The few graduates of the Royal Military College were routinely commissioned into the Royal Staff Corps, a quasi- Engineer unit coming under the authority of the Quartermaster General, but otherwise almost anyone could be appointed to the staff providing hehad served at least one year as a regimental officer. Broadly speaking the Quartermaster General's Department quite literally dealt with the quartering and transporting of the army and everything associated with it. This included the reconnoitring and sometimes the improvement - through the medium of the Royal Staff Corps - of the routes along which the army was to march. Inevitably these duties involved an element of intelligence gathering, which properly speaking fell to the Adjutant General's Department along with the interrogation of prisoners. However the department was not responsible for supplies, which were actually procured and transported by the civilian Commissariat. The Adjutant General and his assistants were responsible for more routine administrative matters, such as discipline and military administration. Both departments were similarly organised on a surprisingly ad hoc basis. Each 'command', be it a field army or a military district had its own staff comprising an Adjutant General (AG) and Quartermaster General (QMG) and one or two Assistants (AAGs and AQMGs) normally ranking as Lieutenant Colonels or Majors. Below them came an indeterminate number of Deputy Assistant Adjutant Generals and Deputy Assistant Quartermaster Generals (DAAGs and DAQMGs) who were usually Captains or sometimes Subalterns. So-called 'personal' staff officers comprised Brigade
Majors and Aid de Camps (ADCs). Although recommended by
their Generals, the first were in effect Brigade Adjutants and their
appointments often outlived their patrons. On the other hand
ADCs appointments were very much in the gift of their masters. A
General was entitled to have three at public expense, a Lieutenant
General two, and a Major General one. If this allocation was found
to be insufficient to fulfill the duties demanded of them, others,
distinguished as 'Extra' ADCs could be added to a General's
personal staff at his own expense. Regulations required all officers
appointed to staff positions to relinquish their regimental rank and
retire on to the Half Pay [5]
which is why so many nominally belonged to exotic or long
disbanded corps such as the Ceylon Regiment or the Royal
Glasgow Regiment to name but two examples.
The reason was of course that if an officer was to be
absent from his corps for any length of time it was desirable for the
resulting vacancy to be filled. In practice observance of this rule
often depended on circumstances. The appointment might only be
of short duration and if both staff officer and regiment were serving
in the same theatre it was understood that he might retain his Full
Pay commission on the understanding that he could be recalled to
regimental duty if the circumstances demanded.
[1] Callahan, R.
The East India Company and Army Reform 1783-1798 Harvard
1972
More Officers and Gentlemen Part I
Officers and Gentlemen Part II
|