by Keith Raynor
NOTES1. The article in Mariners Mirror vol. 28 states that approval for the Sea Fencibles was given by the King in Council on 14 March 1798. However recommendation for raising the Sea Fencibles had been given three days before: Parliament Street, IIth March 1798. (PRO. Kew 06/148 P.49,50)
My Lords', His Majesty's confidential servants havIng taken Into full consideration a plan communicated to them by Earl Spencer for raising a corps of sea fencibles, to assist in the defence of this Kingdom against Invasion, and it appearing to them that in such an emergency the most essential advantages might be expected from a force Of this description, they have thought it their duty, under the present circumstances, to recommend to His Majesty to give the necessary orders for its being carried into execution and I have. accordingly received the King's commands to transmit to your Lordships a copy of the plan in question and to signify to your Lordship's His Majesty's Pleasure that the necessary steps are forthwith to be taken for the formation of a corps of sea fencibles either in conrormily to the suggestions and Terms of the said plan, or with such alterations as may occur to your Lordships, with a view to render the plan more efficient, or to deminish (sic) the expense to-be incurred in any of the details of its execution. The following letter is an example of their expansion: Parliament street, 7 June 1798. (PRO. Kew W06/148 P.82,83)
Sir, I am directed by Mr.Secretary Dundas, to Incise a copy of a proposal transmitted to him by the Lord Lieutenant of the' County of Glamorgan from Lieutenant John Jones, to raise a Corps'ofSea Fencibles for the protection of the coast from Wormhead to the Bay of Swansea, and I am to desire that you will lay the same before the Lord Commissioners of the Admiralty for the Lordships determination. and move their Lordships to communicate the same to the Marquis of Bota. A description of the Sea Fencibles duties appears in Steel's Navy List for March 1810, where their distribution is headed by the following note:
Horse Guards, 21st June 1803. (PRO. Kew WOI/625 P.329 to 331)
My Lord, I beg to request your Lordships earliest attention to the, following objects, some of which have been more immediately brought under my view by the reports of the General Officers commanding in the Southern and Eastern Districts: 1st. That the utmost dispatch should be used in reestablishing the signal posts along the coast. 2nd. That the Sea Fencibles should again be enrolled upon the same or a similar plan to what was adopted in the last war, under the superintendence of active and intelligent naval Officers. General Sir David Dundas states that until this is done no essential service have been more immediately brought under my view by the reports of the General Officers commanding in the Southern and Eastern Districts: 1st. That the utmost dispatch should be used in re-establishing the signal posts along the coast. 2nd. That the Sea Fencibles should again be enrolled upon the same or a similar plan to what was adopted in the last war, under the superintendence of active and intelligent naval Officers. General Sir David Dundas states that until this is done no essential service can be expected from the Sea Batteries upon the coast of his District, where the enemies Privateers have begun to appear. I am, My Lord, yours, etc, Frederick. One example of the "teething" problems of reenrolment can be found in the following letter: (PRO. Kew WO 1 /626 P.417,418)
At a special meeting of the Lieutenancy of the County of Cornwall held at the White Hart Inn, St. Austell on Monday the 3rd day of October 1803: Present, the Right Hble. the Earl of Mount Edgecumbe Lord Lieutenant, the Right Hble. Lord De Dunstanville, M. General Cawell, etc., etc., etc. Resolved: That it appears to this meeting that government have in pay a great number of Sea Fencibles at present of little or no service to the public for want of proper arms; Ordered therefore, that the Lord Lieutenant be requested to apply to the General of the District, most earnestly requesting, that a proper number of gun-boats be furnished by government. That the Sea Fencibles may be employed therein, which in the opinion of this meeting will give a material protection to the coast of Corn wall. Resolved, That no answer having been received from the Admiralty to the Lord Lieutenant's representation of the Defenceless state of the northern coasts of Cornwall, this meeting requests the Lord Lieutenant to renew the application and exert his best endeavours to procure a speedy and satisfactory reply. PRO. Kew, ADM. 28/34, Disbursement Accounts of the Sea Fencibles from North Foreland to East Swail. Submitted by Captain Middleton. Pay of Lieutenant Belden: July. 1803 L£ 7 4s 6d Aug. 1803 £ 13 3s 6d Sep. 1803 £ 12 15s Od Oct. 1803 £ 13 3s 6d Nov. 1803 £ 12 12 15s 0d Dec. 1803 £ 13 3s 6d Jan. 1804 £ 13 13 3s 6d Feb. 1804 £ 12 6s 6d Mar. 1804 £ 13 3s 6d Apr. 1804 £ 12 15s Od May to June. 1804 £ 13 3s 6d June to July. 1804 £ 1 9s 6d REFERENCESThe City of London River Fencibles by W.H. Lapthorne, in the Coast and Country Vol. 8, No. 1, February 1979. The Mariners Mirror, Society for Nautical Research, Vol. 15, 1929 and Vol. 28 1942. Public Characters, 4th Edition, pages 265 to 267, National Maritime Museum. Instructions for the Sea Fencibles, Manuscript copy, Ref. DD257/40, Nottinghamshire Archives. Printed with the permission of the Principal Archivist. Various references in the Public Records Office, Kew, already listed in the text. More Sea Fencibles
2. The Sea Fencibles in Action 3. Instructions for the Sea Fencibles (Manuscript) 4. Notes and References Back to Age of Napoleon 27 Table of Contents Back to Age of Napoleon List of Issues Back to MagWeb Master List of Magazines © Copyright 1998 by Partizan Press. This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com |