by Rick Gayler
2nd Edition Soviet Order of Battle 8th Army Non-Divisional Units
11th Army Non-Divisional Units
27th Army Non-Divisional Units
Baltic MD Reserves
Baltic MD Non-Divisional Units
Leningrad MD Reserves
41st Rifle Corps
Leningrad MD Non-Divisional Units
Baltic Fleet
Resource Points
Antiaircraft Units
Baltic Fleet Aviation
Leningrad/Northern Front VVS
Leningrad PVO
All Other Forces: As shown in the Soviet OB. Dahman Commentary Basically, I have set up the Baltic MD reserves in a forward fashion in an attempt to stall the initial Axis drive at Riga and Kaunas. Kaunas is invulnerable to attack during the surprise turn, while Riga can be attacked at best at 1.5:1 (+1). Even if successful, the units at 1B:1812 make this a shallow victory. The drawback to this deployment is that a well-planned attack can take out the frontier armies early, easily, and generally when isolated. But by shutting down Kaunas and Riga, no rail can be used during the regular June II turn past these points. The Aurora is stationed at 1B:1724 as a distraction. It is my experience that it dies early anyway; this will force the Axis to attack it early, drawing off forces in the June II turn. Fighters are stationed in the Leningrad MD to guard against harassment missions in the opening turn. The c/m units are stationed in Leningrad since they can use exploitation movement to reach the Pskov front, even if harassed. I plan to use all available bombers to harass the rail lines for the July I turn. This means that few of the powerful German infantry divisions will be able to reach attack positions in the Pskov gap. Judge's Verdict There are very few differences between Sam's and Alan's deployments, which isn't surprising given their shared GEnie background. Sam also deemphasizes Riga, although he opts for a 5-point defense. In the first edition of L41, losing Riga in the surprise turn could prove devastating. With the appearance in the second edition of a force in 1B:1812, such an event is not quite so threatening. It isn't very likely that the German player will direct his main effort through Riga now. Thus, defending it lightly seems semi-safe. Beefing Riga up has its drawbacks, too-witness Ed Dickenson's attempt. Perhaps the most exemplary aspect of Sam's deployment is the placement of the Leningrad MD non-divs near Pskov, right at the epicenter of future action. The Luftwaffe cannot interdict units that are already in position! Sam's set up at Daugavpils, where he only has 2 strength points, caused me considerable pondering. The Germans will be able to see this before plotting their special operations prior to play. If a successful Panzer attack can be achieved against hex 1B:2719 in the surprise turn, and the Brandenburger II seizes the 1B:2612/2512 bridge in the regular turn, the stack in Daugavpils can be overrun. This might allow a few c/m units to make better-than-normal progress towards the Pskov gap. I almost banished Sam to second place over this. However, such a German adventure has only about a 45% chance of success, and occupies the Burger from committing other, possibly more damaging, acts of mayhem elsewhere. After sleeping on it, I decided it just didn't offer the Germans a significant advantage. However, if you are the conservative type you can always finagle another strength point into Daugavpils from somewhere else. Quibbles: I don't agree with sacrificing the Aurora. Verdict: First Place (Tie) Go ahead, call me a wimp! After considerable agonizing, I finally decided to declare Alan Tibbetts and Sam Dahman co-winners. Their set ups each had slightly different touches that I really liked, and there just wasn't enough justification to rank one superior to the other. Europa Contest #1 Leningrad: 1941 Scenario Back to Europa Number 38/39 Table of Contents Back to Europa List of Issues Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List © Copyright 1994 by GR/D This article appears in MagWeb.com (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other articles from military history and related magazines are available at http://www.magweb.com |