by by Pat Condray
Reprinted from THE ARMCHAIR GENERAL, Vo/. 1, No. 6 with the kind permission of the author, Pat Condray. The Franco-Prussian War, last of the three wars waged by Bismark to create the German Empire (The Second Reich, as it would later be remembered) was also the last of wars between major powers in which the contestants wore uniforms designed to be seen rather than to keep he wearer inconspicuous. Some troopers fired from the saddle, but post war regulations frowned on the practice. Prussian Dragoon cheating! Like the 1864 and 1866 wars, the war in 1870-71 was pretty much a one sided affair. The Prussian army, with those armies which had been added to hers in the North German Confederation, was more numerous, moreover, its artillery was more powerful, and its cavalry much more effectively used than that of the French. The French infantry, however, had the chassepot, a superior shoulder arm, and was composed of a great many veterans of wars in Italy, Mexico, and North Africa. Inevitably, therefore, though not well led as regards strategy, the French army could not be walked over, and inflicted, prior to the Emperor's capitulation at Sedan heavier losses in killed and wounded than it received. Both Prussia and France were fielding armies as colorful as those of any other period, including the Napoleonic. Both monarchs had their "Guards", while on the German side the lesser princes of the North German Confederation sent their own household troops. The French Guards, who would be forever abolished after the Sedan debacle, entered the war with 21,949 men, 72 guns, and 6,635 horses, forming the following units: Infantry
1 Voltiqueur Division of 4 regiments of 3 battalions each 1 Zouave Regiment of 2 battalions 1 Chasseur a Pied Battalion Cavalry 1 Regiment of 4 squadrons each of the following types:
Artillery
In addition, the field army at the outbreak of war could field 100 regiments of 3 battalions each of line infantry, 20 chasseur battalions, 3 regiments of Zouaves, 1 of Algerian light infantry, 3 of Algerian riflemen, 1 Foreign Legion regiment. The battalions had 6 field and 2 depot companies in most cases. The line cavalry had 10 cuirassier regiments, 12 dragoons regiments, 8 lancer regiments, 12 chasseur a cheval regiments, 8 husssar regiments, 4 chasseur a cheval d'Afrique regiments, and 3 regiments of robed and turbaned Spahis. The artillery of the line had 15 regiments of field artillery and 4 regiments of horse artillery, each having 8 batteries of 6 guns each. By German standards the artillery had too few men and horses per gun. Of the 368 battalions, 252 squadrons, 984 guns, and 3 Engineer regiments of the French field forces, 36 battalions, 40 squadrons, and 60 guns were pinned down at Civita Vecchia, on the Spanish Frontier, and in North Africa, leaving 332 battalions, 22b squadrons, 784 guns (after mobilizing further detachments) massing on the Rhine by early August, 1870. The German forces, which mobilized more slowly, were able to fully prepare for the coming danger because the French command was reluctant to take the offensive in more than token fashion. By early August, three German armies and various independent formations totalling some 474 battalions, 382 squadrons, and 264 batteries were preparing for the great offensive. Both of the belligerents entered the war with peculiar gains and losses from their recent battlefield experiences. In 1866 the Prussian infantry armed with the Dreyse "Needle Gun" had virtually won the short war single handedly. The Prussian cavalry had been outfought, and the artillery badly handled. To correct this the Prussian cavalry had been retrained to range in aggressive masses ahead of the infantry, with small scouting parties out on all sides. The artillery had been entirely equipped with the Krupp breech loading rifled cannon, whose rate of fire and accuracy were much improved. Moreover, the artillery was prepared to move up with the infantry. France, whose La Hitte system 4 and 8 lb. bronze muzzle loading rifles had come as a dramatic surprise to the Austrians in 1859, was rather less concerned about her artillery, but after the surprising success of the Dreyse, she worked overtime to improve the small arms firepower of her army. As a stopgap the Montigny mitrailleuse, or "Canon a balles", a crude machinegun on an artillery carriage was introduced as a battalion gun to put French battalions, using muzzle loading rifles on an even firepower footing with a Prussian battalion. In 1867, besides putting the dragoons in blue instead of the traditional green, and otherwise simplifying the uniform, Napoleon III's army was re-equipped with the chassepot rifle for infantry and the chassepot carbine for light cavalry, dragoons, and artillery. The chassepot had a tighter breech than the Dreyse, and could be used as effectively at 1,200 yds. as the Dreyse at 800 ycls., although truly accurate ranges were somewhat less in either case. The French, on the whole, relied more on defensive positions and skirmishers. They had correctly assessed the difficulty of advancing against rapid fire weapons, but were unable to incorporate the new firepower into a scheme of maneuver. In the open the soldiers and subalterns were aggressive enough, acting in loose lines and swarms of skirmishers. The Prussians and their allies in the North German Confederation relied instead on tight company columns for tactical maneuver, with swarms of skirmishers for fighting. Their infantry fire was excellent when compared to the of the French, although in the early battles, the latter showed a good deal more dash and firepower in skirmish actions. French infantry, because its fire discipline, and discipline in general was weaker, was more vulnerable to surprise by cavalry than was the German, but somewhat superior in straight infantry fighting before the artillery intervened. Prussian Gunners were aggressive and effective in 1870, but sometimes got too close. Here infantry fights from a silenced battery. On both sides the cavalry relied heavily on sword and lance, the French showing perhaps more of a tendency to fight on foot or to fire their carbines from the saddle, and some illustrations show chasseurs a cheval with what appears to be a full length weapon. In any case, this tendency sometimes paid off in broken ground and was probably due tothe fact that theGerman cavalry weapon was depressingly inaccurate. The French were also prone to stay in large parties and stick close to the infantry, not because they feared the German horse, but because small parties were often wiped out in North Africa and Mexico, while large ones could usually ride over the opposition. Cuirassiers on both sides wore steel helmets, breastplates, and were armed only with sword and pistol. The French lancers and German Uhlans were also armed only with pistols and cold steel, all on the theory that shoulder arms rob the cavalry of dash. In the German service cuirassiers were heavy, uhlans medium, dragoons and hussars light. The division normally had 6 regiments of 4 squadrons each, supported by a battery of 6 horse guns and usually formed in 3 brigades. The brigades were of different "weight", i.e., cuirassiers, uhlans, and light horse frequently appeared in the same division. Sir Frederick N. Maude's article on cavalry in the famous 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica suggests that this system was exclusively for recruiting and maintenance, since light, medium, and heavy cavalry move at different speeds and have different functions, but such does not appear to have been the case, since Breclow led out a brigade which included the 7 Cuirassiers and 16 Uhlans in his famous death ride. Each major formation was expected to have some light horse for scouting and if (heaven forbid) some necessity for dismounted action arose. Light cavalry also performed services of reconnaisance and close support for infantry divisions, owing to the difficulty of concealing larger bodies of cavalry near the front, the divisional squadrons were often the only ones able to get in on the pursuit. Except in rare cases, the French neglected scouting and screening for the infantry, and saved the cavalry for spectacular and highly unsuccessful charges on the battlefield. As a result, the French army, with its aggressive and well equipped infantry hampered by relatively ineffective artillery and cautious tactical doctrines, got little successful use of its cavalry. On several occasions (twice with 2 cuirassier divisions at Foreschwiller) French cavalry was thrown at the enemy to cover a maneuver of the infantry, usually retreat. The cavalry attacks did slow the Germans down, for it was the custom of the German infantry to halt, form up in triple line and wait until the charge was about two or three hundred yards away and shoot the hell out of it. Sometimes the Germans just stopped whatever else they were doing and received the charge at close range from any convenient obstacle. The only trouble with slowing down the Germans that was was that the same Germans would soon be at it again, butyou could only use the same cavalry against them once, since so little of it came back. At Vionville the pick of the French cavalry got into an involved brawl with an about equal force of crack German units and the two masses slammed about for some time before the French, then the Germans, sorted themselves out and retreated in different directions, one French force following the retiring Germans at a discreet distance. The chief result was that some years later, on studying their casualty reports, the Germans found that the heaviest loss rate had been inflicted by the French Guard Lancers on the Oldenberg Dragoons, and this was one of their reasons for equipping all of their cavalry with lances in preparation for World War I. Some, of course, may conclude that the lance was added because the Kaiser thought lance penons enhanced the martial splendor of cavalry parades, but a lot of thought apparently went into the decision. For wargamers the best way to get cavalry into an 1870 game is to use it well ahead of the main armies. True, the French cavalry was usually kept back, but one need not duplicate all of the historical mistakes of the losing party. The role played by superior Prussian horse artillery, if the weapons difference is taken into account, may well be matched by mitrailleuse, clattering along behind the squadrons of red legged lancers, cuirassiers, dragoons, chasseurs, and hussars. FRANCO-PRUSSIAN WAR FIGURES AVAILABILITYGiven the unfortunate fact that the Franco-Prussian War is so seldom played it is not surprising that pickings in the area are somewhat slim. However there are several manufacturers who do make ranges. Die Kaiserzeit, P.O. Box 38, Keyport, N.J. 07735. Freiherr Daub considers this company a labor of love. It shows. They offer over 70 figures of the Franco-Prussian period and many more by slight alteration might be added. The figures are small 25mm matching Airfix in size. They retail at about 45c per foot and $1.05 per horse and rider. Peter Liang, Minden, Nicholas, Hereford HRi 313D, Great Britain. Peter started the 15mm craze. He has about 30 figures in his range. He includes guns which no one else seems to make. The figures retail in England for 11c per foot, 22C per Cavalry and 30c per gun. I have no knowledge of export and postage costs. Mike's Models, P.O. Box 1141, Denville, N.J. 07834. Some time ago Mike's was due to come out with a Franco- Prussian range. I even saw some of the prototypes. The firm should be encouraged to do so now. MPC Plastic Kits: These prepackaged Airfix are available in most hobby and toy stores. They have recently re-released the Foreign Legion and WWI German kits. Both make fine soldiers for the war with little or no conversion. They retail at about $2.25 for a box of 48 figures. Jack Scruby, The Soldier Factory, P.O. Box 1658, Cambria, CA 93428. Jack offers about 40 figures in his small 25mm range, again matching Airfix in size. The figures are among Jack's better efforts. They are 70(v per foot and $1.40 per Cavalry. Tradition of Scandinavia, P.O. Box 21170, S-100 31 Stockholm, Sweden. For the very best in 30mm Tradition offers a large range of WWI figures easily used for Franco- Prussian. These fine 30s run $1.50 per foot and $5.00 per cavalry. For artillery in all but 15mm scale the Franco-Prussian gamer is forced to fudge. I recommend the use of a Whitworth Rifle for the Prussian artillery and the aptly named Napoleon for the French. Mitrailleuse must be either scratch-built or borrowed from colonial gatling guns. While on the subject of borrowing, many Civil War Zouaves do very well as French originals or colonial Turcos. When I built my Franco-Prussian armies I did it nearly all from Airfix at almost no cost. They have since not only proven their courage on the table top but have somehow won painting awards as well. It is a tremendously colorful period that is a joy to paint. Another approach would be to use the 15mm and 25mm molds for the period now offered by Joel Haas, 3215 Merriman Ave., Raleigh, NC 27607. Related Back to Table of Contents -- Courier Vol. V #6 To Courier List of Issues To MagWeb Master Magazine List © Copyright 1984 by The Courier Publishing Company. This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com |