News from the Front: Review:
![]() |
Blood On The Painted Mountain:
The author has written it largely from the perspective of the Colonial irregulars who made up the British assault party on Hlobane, and as such he finds considerable fault with the regular officers, Wood himself and his right-hand man Redvers Buller. There is some substance to this, since the attack on Hlobane was clearly badly planned and mismanaged in the execution, and Wood himself missed several opportunities to take a decisive role. Nevertheless, a deeper look at both the British regulars, and the Zulus - whose perspective in this book is almost entirely lacking - would have given Blood On The Painted Mountain more depth. The limitations of this approach are also apparent in an interesting and controversial chapter on Isandlwana, based largely on the accunt of one Colonial Volunteer officer. This account was written at a time when the British and Colonial survivors of the Isandlwana debacle were blaming each other for the disaster, and, further more, was written as part of a campaign waged by Col. Durnford's relatives to shift the blame away from Durnford and on to Lord Chelmsford's staff. Although it raises some interesting points, this account is almost entirely contradicted by the mass of evidence from other survivors, hoth British and Zulu. Nevertheless Blood On The Painted Mountain is certainly worth reading, and includes some interesting previously unpublished illustrations. More Reviews:
Reviews: Osprey Titles News: American Wars Review: Blood on Painted Mountain Review: The South African Campaign of 1879 Review: A Widow-Making War News: Living History: Siege of Eshowe Review: Badges of the British Army Review: The Military and United States Indian Policy Review: The Military in British India Back to Colonial Conquest Issue 11 Table of Contents © Copyright 1996 by Partizan Press. This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. |