Regulating Your Battalions?

The Regulating Solution in “Regulations”

by David Commerford & Howie Muir, UK

Dundas’ Principles served as the basis of Britain’s new Rules and Regulations, in 1792, which went on to further amplifying the workings of the concept:

    The movements of all great bodies are made either in line or column.— In line they are in general regulated by a battalion of that flank which is nearest to, and is to preserve the appui, or which is to make the attack : in column they are directed by its head, and the commander of the whole is with the regulating body. There are very few cases in which the centre ought to regulate, although the direct march of the line in front appears to be the easiest conducted by a battalion of the centre. If an enemy is to be turned, or an attack made, it is by that flank that such movements are led : it is the flank that must preserve the line of appui in all movements in front : if the line is thrown backward or forward, it is generally on a flank point : if the line breaks into column, it is the head or leading flank of the column which conducts, and whose writhes and turnings are followed by every other part of the body, and such head becomes a flank when formed into line : it is seldom that an attack is formed from the centre, and a movement seldomer need be. — The commander will therefore be on whichever flank directs the operations of the line, and by which he proposes to make the attack, or to counteract the attempts of the enemy.
      --British Regulations, pp.284-5.

Here we learn not only what the role of a Regulating Battalion was, but what part the general officer played and some sense of where he was expected “generally” to be on the battlefield. Specifically:

    Commanding Officers of regiments, brigades, or larger bodies, are moveable according to circumstances, and should by no means consider the centre of such bodies as their general post in exercise or in movements, or expect by the exertion of one voice, from one fixed situation, to command and direct the whole: their presence is more frequently required near one or the other flank; in general, they should be at the beginning and conducting point of the movement or formation, and to that address their orders by voice or message; for if that point is led or placed in the direction it should take, there is little danger of the other parts of the body not properly or successively conforming to it.
      --Observations

John Macdonald, in a footnote to his 1803 translation of the French Regulations (p.430), observed that:

    “In the British service, the regulating battalion is generally on the right ; all the others march by it, and by their own respective centres.”

It is interesting to compare the British expectations of the Regulating Battalion and general officer’s position with that of the French:

    The commander in chief can, always, assume as the battalion of regulation, that which he judges the best calculated for directing the line; but when particular reasons do not operate in favour of selecting a battalion on, or near the flank, a central battalion may have preference.
      --French Regs. of 1791.

Macdonald further notes (p.341) that; “A Prussian regulating battalion is, generally, a central one.”

The Brigade Commander would position himself near the Regulating Battalion during the manoeuvre in order to steer the Brigade on the right course by use of the Battalion. Near the enemy no doubt he might reposition himself to lead by example as is often recorded, presumably waiting until the Brigade was close enough for it not to be able to miss its destination.

He normally communicated directly with the officer commanding the directing unit:

    If several regiments exercise or manoeuvre together, the Commanding Officer of the line or column gives, when necessary, his short orders of caution or execution to the Commander of the regulating battalion of the line, or of the head of the column, where he himself generally is, and sometimes to the Commander of the battalion, to which he is then nearest; and each battalion Commander repeats them aloud without delay.
      --Both British Regulations (pp. 283 & Observations)

Even when a Battalion Commander could not, or did not, understand or receive specific verbal orders, he took his cue for action from the Regulating Battalion, or those “up-stream” of him who were, in turn, following the regulating unit:

    When the general order is not heard or understood by part of a line, each battalion Commander (where the intention is obvious) will conform, as quickly as possible, to the movements which he sees executed to his right or left, according to the point from whence the movement begins. But platoon Officers execute only on the orders of their battalion Commander.
      --Both British Regulations (pp. 283) & Observations (the French Regulations, 1791, impose a similar requirement; see p. 274).

Audible signals could also be used to assist with the brigade’s management; of particular importance, signals provided a way for the Brigade Commander to change which unit performed the role of regulating battalion:

    When a line halted is to be put in motion, and before the word march, a drum may beat a march, or give a roll from whatever battalion is to direct: such a signal will be considered as announcing the directing battalion, and such battalion, during the march, will occasionally repeat. If necessary, during the march, from obstacles to change the directing battalion, the drum from the new battalion will announce such change”
      -- Observations.

Thus, a Brigade Commander could direct his brigade’s movement, both with respect to its axis of advance and its speed. In turn, if the Division were to move as a whole, the Divisional Commander would designate a Regulating Brigade, which in purpose and relationship, would be a scaled-up version of the Regulating Battalion concept.

The Divisional Commander would frequently be found in proximity to his Regulating Brigade, particularly if at the head of a column.

Thus the elements of an entire Corps could be directed on the orders of its one commander, well beyond vocal range and far more rapidly than the use of messengers would permit. It should be noted that while we have used the infantry as an example, both the cavalry and artillery (when the latter was moving independently and in more than one unit) had their own equivalents of this process to assist in the control of the whole army.


Regulating Your Battalions Tactical Processes and Simulation


Back to Table of Contents -- First Empire # 76
Back to First Empire List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List
© Copyright 2004 by First Empire.
This article appears in MagWeb.com (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other articles from military history and related magazines are available at http://www.magweb.com