by Jim O'Neal
Before reading on, I must explain that my treatment of warfare in general may seem too light-hearted to some. The subject matter is so serious that I find the only way to retain any sanity is through the use of humour. In the preamble to JOHNNY REB III, John Hill makes a, similar but far more eloquent comment in regard to the captions used in some of the illustrations to that excellent set of rules. Back in the Stone Age when I had access to a wargames club in Manchester, England, the highlight of the month was a re-fight of a historical battle. The twist in the tale was that the participants were told only the period but not the battle. If it were a Napoleonic Peninsular battle, then the terrain would be set out for a Bussaco or a Talavera and would usually be easily recognizable as such by the salient points on the battlefield and the initial dispositions of the troops. Since the club specialized in Napoleonic wargaming, most players would be familiar with the arrival times of reinforcements, and of course the historical outcome of the battle. Our "Generals" would then attempt to avoid the mistakes committed by their historical counterparts and proceed to accomplish even greater blunders of their own making. After a time this palled a little and, although this idea is not by any means new, it was decided to re-fight a couple of historical battles with troops other than those that were actually engaged. Since this could not be taken too far, such as attempting to wargame Shiloh with Roman Legions or the 101st Airborne, the troops had to fit into a similar period. For want of a better definition, the "Horse and Musket" period lends itself to this type of game. There were basically the three arms, Cavalry, Artillery and the PBI, which constituted the common denominator from the time of Frederick The Great to Napoleon III. Admittedly the traditional role of cavalry diminished as the period progressed. In later years troopers were actually encouraged to abandon their beloved animals and, against all the laws of nature, fight on foot. If the Good Lord had intended cavalrymen to fight dismounted, He would not have created the horse. Until recently, my forte has been wargaming the Napoleonic Peninsular war, but of late I have developed a deep interest in the American Civil War and have been reading extensively over the past few years. I have acquired the appropriate rules and figures to enjoy engagements at all levels from skirmish (BROTHER AGAINST BROTHER) through regimental (JOHNNY REB III) to army command (FIRE & FURY). I use the now discontinued but exquisite 40mm ACW figures from Foundry and was lucky enough to be able to purchase what were almost the last of them. Thanks Neville. "Our Welly" and "Friendship's Choice" Now you may wonder where "Our Welly" and
"Friendship's Choice" [1] fit into the
scheme of things. Drawing on both my wargaming
passions, I propose to offer an American Civil War
scenario based on the battle of Salamanca. The
opposing commanders were The Duke of
Wellington, leading about 50,000 British and
Portuguese confronting Marechal Marmont
controlling an almost equal number of French.
This scenario lends itself beautifully to the FIRE &
FURY rules. The terrain in Spain, being mostly
vertical, also translates quite well into some of the
more rugged areas of the western theatre of the
War Between the States. The whole idea of
transferring this battle through time is, besides
offering some variety, to see if the effects of the
advances in weaponry and tactics after the
passage of nearly 50 years affects the outcome. It
should also come as a good surprise to the
members of your club if you tell them beforehand
that they are
about to fight an actual historical battle which,
for reasons that will become apparent later, we
have renamed "The Battle of Twin Peaks."
Inform them that the OOBs reflect the correct
brigade strengths present, but the commander's
names have been omitted to add some suspense.
It may also be an idea to offer a small prize to
the first person to guess the correct name of the
battle, but before doing so, it might pay to ensure
that there are no closet Napoleonic buffs lurking
in your club.
On the morning of 22 July 1812,
Marechal Auguste Frederic Louis Viesse de
Marmont, duc de Raguse
[2]
was feeling pretty pleased with himself.
For over a month he had out manoeuvred
Wellington, who was considered to be the best
British general since Marlborough [3].
The battlefield of Salamanca
consists of two long parallel ranges of high
ground; each punctuated by a hill. The hill on the
north was called the Lesser Arapile and its
counterpart on the south, being some 100 feet
higher, the Greater Arapile. Of Marmont's eight
infantry divisions, he intended to pin Wellington
with two, keep one in reserve and use the other
five to march around the Allied army and attack
it in the flank and rear (see map A).
Should this
have come off, Marmont would have executed a
perfect example of his master's "manoeuvre sur
les derrieres" and no doubt cleared the Allies
from Spain. By midday the plan was well into
execution but Wellington had noticed the
movements and started taking countermeasures
of his own (see map B).
These led to a race along the inner
and outer arcs of the hills.
The French out
marched the Allies gaining the Greater Arapile
whilst the Allies held the Lesser Arapile, but in
so doing Marmont became strung out and invited
defeat in detail. His invitation was graciously
accepted (see maps C & D).
Seeing that a gap of a mile had
opened up between Marmont's three leading
divisions, Wellington, who was having a light
lunch at the time suddenly threw the remains of a
half-eaten chicken leg over his shoulder and
exclaimed, "By God! That will do!" He turned to
his Spanish liaison officer and remarked, "Mon
cher Alava, Marmont est perdu."
With that, he galloped over to Edward
Pakenham [4], the leader of the Allied Third Division
and said calmly, "Ned, do you see those fellows
over there? Throw your division into column and
drive them to the devil." Thomieres' division was
the first to feel the thunderbolt.
One moment it
had been marching happily along expecting to
come into the rear of the Allies, when suddenly
the entire Third Division appeared from the folds
in the ground in line of battle less than five
hundred yards from its right flank. The shock to
the French troops was so great that, although they
had heard that in every corporal's knapsack there was a Marshal's baton, at this particular moment they would have settled for a change of underwear.
This was the beginning of a bad
afternoon for Marmont. First, he saw his plans
crumble before his eyes. Then, while running
to his horse in an attempt to retrieve the
situation he was severely wounded by
shrapnel from a deliberately aimed round: an
occurrence that was extremely rare in those
days. His succesor, Bonnet, was equally
unfortunate. He assurned the reigns of
command only to be hit by a musket ball within
minutes of his promotion. The task of leading
the French now fell to Clausel.
While the French command was in
tatters, the divisions of Maucune and Brennier
were in turn routed by the assaults of Bradford
and Leith with no little help from the British
cavalry lead by Le Marchant's brigade. This
cavalry charge was a prominent feature of the
battle, and although it cost Le Marchant his life,
contributed immensely to the outcome.
Wellington now assaulted the Greater
Arapile. Clausel however proved himself equal
to the occasion and not only repulsed the
attack, but drove the Allies back almost to the
foot of the Lesser Arapile with a counter attack
of his own and seriously threatened their centre.
This stroke eventually petered out
against the fresh troops of Clinton's Sixth
Division which up until now had been held in
reserve been committed by Wellington at just
the right moment. By this time, five of the
original eight French divisions had been
accounted for and the remainder of their army
fled the field covered by a masterly rearguard
action under first Ferrey and then Foy. Total
Allied casualties were 5,214 whereas those of
the French, although impossible to determine
accurately, were in the region of 14,000. In their
haste to depart, they also left behind some 20
cannon.
Writing in his journal six days later,
Foy was to compare Wellington's attack to
Frederick The Great's famous assault in the
oblique order at Leuthen .[5] A less exalted
French officer put it more succinctly when he
remarked that "Wellington had accounted for
forty thousand Frenchmen in forty minutes."
[1] "Our Welly" was one
of the more polite terms of affection for the Iron Duke. Others
included "Old Hooky" and "The bugger who leathers the French."
Napoleon, to his later regret, always regardcd him its "that Sepoy
General" because of Wellington's service in India.
"Friendship's Choice" came from it murmur which ran through
the French Grognards in 1809 when Napoleon created three new
Marshals of the Empire. It went:
More And Now for Something Completely Different
This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. |