by Stephen Blank
Any political solution to the disputes between Russia and the Baltic states must also settle economic and border claims on both sides. These two aspects of Russo-Baltic relations intensify the crisis precipitated by the issue of troop withdrawals. Russia's Parliament and Vice-President Aleksandr' Rutskoi are already urging sanctions against Estonia due to its citizenship laws. Russia's market reforms inevitably will also have an unintended secondary and negative impact on the Baltic states. For instance, if and when Russia charges world prices
in convertible currency for its energy exports to the Baltic
states, it could cripple their economies while complying with
virtually unanimous Western recommendations for economic
reform. Those urging economic warfare follow the Soviet
tradition of seeing Russo-Baltic relations as a zero-sum game,
a viewpoint that alarms the Baltic states and economists who
understand how much both sides gain from mutual amity.
[40]
The Baltic states are vulnerable to tariff wars, energy
shutdowns or Russian changes to currency convertibility
because they have delayed their own reforms. A recent IMF
study illustrated the extent to which they are hostage to Russian
policy. [41]
Should the right wingers win, there is little doubt they
would use economic instruments. For example, Russian
factories already are in arrears on debts owed to Baltic
factories. Those factories, to recover any of their losses, can
then be forced to accept payment in rubles and exist within the
ruble zone thereby becoming vulnerable to sanctions.
[42]
Failure to resolve economic issues only intensifies
Russian fears about the impending consequences of future
Baltic reforms and contributes to the movement by heavily
Russified areas like Estonia's Narva District and the areas
between Knigisepp Raion of St. Petersburg and parts of
Pskov Oblast to secede from Estonia to Russia. Estonia
claims that these areas belonged to it and that they were
recognized by the Soviet state in their 1920 treaty, but Moscow rejects those
claims. Russian agitation, threats of strikes, brown-outs, and
demands for secession of these areas and merger with Russia
are becoming more strident, especially as agitation from
Moscow stimulates existing fears that already are quite high. 13
The worst fanatics on both sides call for something like ethnic
cleansing thereby aggravating tensions.
[44]
The deliberate incitement of nationalist enmities and fears
by both sides that took place as negotiations reached the
present impasse also suggests a larger campaign of
deliberate psychological warfare.
[45]
Should this campaign go further and nationalist
forces dominate, the results could be very nasty indeed.
|