by Howard Whitehouse
![]() |
Officer's Pocketbook: Edited selections from Callwell's chapter on Hill Warfare, Robert's "Forty-One Years in India", Chamberlain's Field Force instructions for the 2nd Afgan War, Warburton's memoirs for the political officer's end of things. I haven't really looked into it, but I assume that there must be many sources of useful advice to young officers in the frontier literature - after all there were expeditions in the hills every few months for a hundred years. John Masters for the later years. Who else? Send me suggestions, or, better still, photocopies of useful passages, and I'll work on putting them together.
On the other side, the difference is between tribal warriors from the hill clans, and the at-leastpartially drilled regulars of the Amirs of Kabul. Then, of course, we could include the Czar's Legions. "Frontier troops" include such excellent fellows as the Gurkhas, Guides, Punjab Frontier Force, and lesser types like the Khyber Rifles. One might also include British and Indian "lowland" units with very long records of hill campaigning. Movement Rates are the same as usual, with the addition of elephants which move at 40 yards per minute, whether in "pack" mode, carrying mountain A guns, or teamed in pairs for heavy wheeled ordnance. What is different are the rules for rough terrain. On the N.W.F. there is precious little open ground outside the major valleys. Broker country varies from minor obstructions - rocks, open pine woods, lesser slopes - to serious mountain barriers. Let's divide it into:
Rough; fairly broken terrain, mountain paths through more difficult ground. Rugged; steep slopes, nullahs, rocky hills. Inaccessible; your basic crampon territory, passable only to open order foot at pathetically slow rates. Impossible; 'nuff said.
Pathan weapons varied from warrior to warrior, being a mixture of traditional 'jezail" matchlocks, old British service firearms, and anything else that came to hand. By the 1897 rising, large numbers of Martini-Henrys were in tribal hands, and gunrunning across the sea from Arabia was becoming a serious issue to British authorities. Afghan regulars in the, 1878-81 war carried Sniders of Enfield muzzleloaders. We might say that Pathans are either "badly" or "well" armed, depending on the time and place, and that within a tribal "lashkar", some clans might be well-armed, others not.
Ghazis were the fanatics of the frontier. In most incidences, they comprised small bands, but at times of great enthusiasm, such as the rising fomented by the Mullah Powindah in 1897, or the Fakir of Ipi in the 1920's. The whole Pathan army besieging the Malakand forts appeared to be in a fanatical state for weeks on end. Ghazis count "+3" for reaction purposes, which ought to ensure fairly berserk behaviour! Percentage of Ghazis
Modifiers:
Camp followers were an integral part of Indian campaigning, and should serve to give the players a variety of problems. So - reaction ought to be -2, milling about when "excited", and getting in the way of soldiers when nervous or panicked. Unarmed, will scatter if attacked, move slowly with the baggage, but c.100 yards per minute when upset in any way. Do not allow players to rid themselves of the followers without major problems ensuing, especially to the morale of the Indian troops. Other Stuff: there are a number of areas that ought to be addressed - care for the Imperial wounded so that they are not "left on Afghanistan's plains", rules for rolling rocks down hills, for later innovations like armoured cars, aircraft and light tanks. Scenarios might include night marches, withdrawals under fire and "political" operations, as well as the well known "butcher and bolt" punitive expedition. Back to MWAN # 38 Table of Contents Back to MWAN List of Issues Back to MagWeb Magazine List © Copyright 1989 Hal Thinglum This article appears in MagWeb.com (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other articles from military history and related magazines are available at http://www.magweb.com |