by Chris J. Hahn
This year marks the 185th anniversary of the Battle of Quatre Bras. It will be an anniversary remembered by few and commemorated by an even smaller number of people. The more significant date of course, is Sunday, June 18. On this date in 1815, Napoleon Bonaparte was defeated on the field of Waterloo by the combined AngloAllied and Prussian armies. BACKGROUND For my birthday in January of this year, I asked for and received a copy of SHAKO (Arty Conliffe's Rules and Army Lists for Napoleonic Wargaming). Taking his advice, I read the rules through once and then went back and looked at specific sections more carefully. Upon completion of the re-read, I set the book aside and went back to work. Literally. A seemingly never-ending list of commitments or "things to do", frustrated any attempt to get back to SHAKO and its engaging contents. In May, things finally slowed down and I was able to revisit the Horse & Musket effort by the prolific Mr. Conliffe. Three more times through the rules and twice as many as that looking over the Army Lists, inspired me to begin preparing for a division versus division play test. However, the renewed impetus broke down as the merits of Prussian and French in 1806 were argued against French versus English in Spain, circa 1809. The waffling between figure scale and representation certainly did not help matters. In as much as it was a diversion as it was an attempt to find a better idea, I turned to my collection of wargame magazines and journals. It was here, while skimming through Issue No. 57 of Miniature Wargarnes, that I found an article detailing the Battle of Quatre Bras. And the figurative idea light went on over my head. ORDERS OF BATTLE DISCOVERY Mr. Rayner's well done article in the aforementioned magazine proved to be problematic when I attempted to reconcile his numbers (both in terms of battalions and figures) with the unit representation utilized in SHAKO. For example, in Lt Gen Bachelu's 5th Division, a battalion of the 108th has 24 figures. In Sir Charles Alten's 3rd Anglo-Hanoverian Division, the 33rd Foot has 15 figures. Unit combat strength or "staying power" is represented in SHAKO by unit morale rating. There are five classes of infantry battalion / morale rating: Guard, Elite, Regular, Second Rate, and Unreliable. Both the French and British battalion in this example - in my estimation - rate a Regular ranking. Giving this ranking to the British unit however, negates the numerical superiority of the French unit. The SHAKO rules state: "The MR reflects a unit's ability to absorb and inflict punishment. Units with a higher MR are more effective in every aspect of fighting." (3) So, the question remains: How to resolve this problem? Consulting the stacks again, I ran across an old issue of The Courier in which I found rule amendment ideas for ON TO RICHMOND. In the second day of an OTR battle, so an amendment read, some units would not be at full-strength as they had taken losses on the previous day. The same idea could be applied to this rule set, wherein a unit of foot could indeed be rated as Regulars, but have a reduced number of kill points and thereby, reach its breaking point sooner than a larger unit. I think such an idea / rules amendment, at least for this historical scenario, has merit. However, the effort in this section of the article is on the order of battle for Quatre Bras, and not "home rules". Mr. Rayner's article proved both an stepping stone and stumbling block to my research. For example: for Bachelu's 5th Division, he details four regiments in the division (three are line and one is light), comprising a total of five battalions (four of line and one of light). At his scale representation, 1:33, the five infantry battalions give a division strength of approximately 3,960. Careful reading of 16 June: Ouatre Bras and Ligny, a chapter in Waterloo: New Perspectives, reveals that Bachelu in fact, had nine battalions, a total of 4000 men, under his command. These sources provide a near similar number for division total, but a significant difference for number of battalions. Which source is correct? Or, is there another source by which I can compare this information? MWAN readers may recall that I reviewed a computer simulation game entitled FIELDS OF GLORY in Number 78. In the review I concentrated on the outstanding graphics and the manner in which one played the game. In the very last sentence, I noted that the simulation is doubly valuable as a resource for unit strengths, commander ability and so forth. It was to this resource then, that I turned, and as the reader will note in the subsequent orders of battle, used as my main point of reference. ORDERS OF BATTLE It took a little under two hours to review the database of units for Quatre Bras on the FIELDS OF GLORY disk. The orders of battle in Mr. Rayner's article and the HamiltonWilliams text were used as a starting point / reference point. There were many advantages to utilizing the FIELDS OF GLORY database. In addition to providing a very nice visual depiction of the uniform worn by the soldiers in the unit, unit strengths were listed, as well as the name of regimental or battery commanders. Higher-level command was rated on several characteristics, such as Ability and Leadership. Finally, there were battle honor listings for most units, and brief biographical notes on the divisional and corps commanders. Format Note: In order to reduce typing time, the command / unit identifications constructed for the miniature units were edited into this document. The SHAKO rating / MR value appears at the bottom of each unit identification. Explanatory notes follow each division listing. A general notes section follows each complete order of battle. FRENCHOVERALL COMMAND: MARSHALL NEY, Left Wing, ARMEE DU NORD, Command and Suite with 3 ADC's / Couriers II CORPS, COMMAND: LT GENERAL COUNT REILLE , II CORPS, Command and Suite with w ADC's / Couriers 5TH DIVISION: LT GEN BARON BACHELU 5TH DIVISION II CORPS 18TH / 6TH FT ART REGT
5TH DIVISION
3/0 (6 x 61b / 2 x 5.5)
Notes:
6TH DIVISION: PRINCE JEROME BONAARTE 6TH DIVISION II CORPS 2ND FT ARTILLERY
REGT 6TH DIVISION / II
CORPS 3/0 (6 x 61b / 2 x 5.5)
Notes:
9TH DIVISION: GENERAL COMTE M.
FOY 9TH DIVISION II CORPS
Notes: FOG gives 2,554 in the 1st Brigade and 2,752 in the
2nd Brigade, for a total of 5,306. R calculates the
division total at 5,544. (4,158 in the Line Regiments;
1,386 in the Light Regiments)
2ND CAVALRY DIVISION LT GEN BARON PIRE 2ND CAVALRY DIVISION II CORPS COMMAND & SUITE 1ST CHASSEURS 1ST BRIGADE / 2ND BARON
HUBER 4/1
Notes: FOG gives 1,045 in the 1st Brigade and 817 in the 2nd Brigade, for a total of 1,862 cavalry. R calculates the division total at 2,112. (This total figure divided evenly between Chasseurs and Lancers.) HW reports approximately 1,800 men in 15 squadrons. There was no separate lower-echelon cavalry command noted in a review of the FOG database. Baron Pire's cavalry division fits in nicely with both the command and division strength rules in SHAKO, however. III CAVALRY CORPS, COMMAND: LT GEN KELLERMANN with 2 ADC's Couriers COMTE de VALMY III CAVALRY CORPS COMMAND & SUITE GEN BARON D'HURBAL 12TH DIVISION COMMAND III CORPS 2ND CAVALRY BRIGADE 12TH DIV / III CHEVALIER DONOP 2ND CUIRASSIERS 2ND BGD / 12TH DIV COL GANDJEAN 6/2 3RD CUIRASSIERS 2ND BGD / 12TH DIV COL THOROT 6/2 1ST CAVALRY BRIGADE 12TH DIV / III BARON BLANCHARD 2ND CARABINIERS 1ST BGD / 12TH DIV COLBOUGNAT 6/2 1ST CARABINIERS 1ST BGD / 12TH DIV COL ROGE 6/2 HORSE ARTILLERY OF THE LINE 12TH CAVALRY DIVISION 3/0 (4 X 61b / 2 x 5-5) BARON L'HERTIER 11TH DIVISION COMMAND III CORPS 2ND CAVALRY BRIGADE 11TH DIV / III BARON GUITON 8TH CUIRASSIERS 2ND BGD / 11TH DIV COL GARAVAQUE 6/2 11TH CUIRASSIERS 2ND BGD / 11TH DIV COL COURTIER 6/2 1ST CAVALRY BRIGADE 11TH DIV / III BARON PICQUET 2ND DRAGOONS 1ST BGD / 11TH DIV COL PLANZEAU 5/2 7TH DRAGOONS 1ST BGD / 11TH DIV COL LEOPOLD 5/2 3RD / 2ND HORSE ARTILLERY 11TH CAVALRY DIVISION 3/0 (4X61b/2x5.5) Notes: FOG gives 1,110 in the 1st Brigade of the 11th Division and 791 in the 2nd Brigade, for a total of 1,901 cavalry. In the 12th Division, the numbers are 791 (2nd Brigade) and 847 for a total of 1,638. R does not separate the regiments into divisions, but calculates the corps total at 3,168. (This total figure divided into 1,584 Cuirassiers, 792 Dragoons and a like number of Carabiniers.) HW reports approximately 3,700 men in the corps; 1,026 Cuirassiers in one of the brigades. R indicates in the reinforcement schedule that part of this cavalry was involved at the first cannon shots. The remainder coming into play much later in the engagement for the crossroads. This poses a problem, given the rules concerning divisional integrity in SHAKO. General Notes: FOG = FIELDS OF GLORY R = The Rayner article HW = The Waterloo Text For the French then, there are 33 infantry battalions on, or fast approaching, the field. In "support" there are five (5) Voltigeur stands. Each infantry division has an attached artillery battery. In terms of command and control, there is one overall commander, a corps commander, three (3) division commanders, and six (6) brigade commanders. The cavalry complement to this fighting force numbers 12 regiments, with three (3) Horse Artillery batteries in tow. Command and control for the mounted element is: one corps commander, three (3) division commanders (one not attached to the corps), and four (4) brigade commanders. As I elected to rely on the database in FOG for the composition of both French and Anglo- Allied forces, it seems only logical to maintain that reliance with respect to numbers involved. An accounting of the French force gives the following numbers: 17,228 Infantry, 5,401 Cavalry, 3 batteries of Foot Artillery (24 guns), and 3 batteries of Horse Artillery (18 guns). The totals for infantry and cavalry are a near match for the grand totals listed in the Hamilton-Williams text. There is a discrepancy with the number of cannon available, however. Both Mr. Rayner and Hamilton-Williams "give" the French 16 more pieces of foot artillery. And so, without revising the entire French order of battle, I am simply adding two (2) batteries of foot artillery as a Corps Reserve. Under the SHAKO rules, these will be considered Army guns / batteries. ANGLO-ALLIEDOVERALL COMMAND: THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON ANGLO-ALLIED ARMY COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF AND SUITE with 3 ADC's Couriers I CORPS, COMMAND: HSH PRINCE OF ORANGE I CORPS COMMAND & SUITE with 2 ADC's Couriers 2ND NETHERLANDS DIVISION: BARON H. PERPONCHER-SEDLNITZKY COMMAND 2ND D-B DIVISION STEVENART'S FT BATTERY BELGIAN 2ND D-B DIVISION 3/0 (6 X 61b / 2 x 5.5")
Notes: FOG gives 4,431 in the 2nd Brigade of the Dutch-Belgian Division and 3,233 in the 1st Brigade, for a total of 7,664. FOG also cites a Volunteer Jaeger company or companies, as part of the 2nd Brigade. At
the scale used in SHAKO, such elements are not applicable.
2ND LIGHT CAVALRY
BRIGADE:
Notes: FOG gives 1,092 men in this independent
cavalry brigade.
5TH ANGLO-HANOVERIAN DIVISION: SIR THOMAS PICTON LT GENERAL 5TH
ANGLO-ALLIED DIV.
Notes: FOG gives 2,670 for the Hanoverian Brigade, 1,765
for Pack's Brigade, and 1,990 for Kempt's command. This
yields a division total of 6,425.
THE BRUNSWICK DIVISION CONTINGENT: DUKE WILLIAM OF BRUNSWICK COMMAND & SUITE BRUNSWICK CONTINGENT FOOT ARTILLERY BRUNSWICK CONTINGENT 3/0 (8 x 6lb)
Notes: FOG gives 979 Hussars in the Cavalry
Brigade. (There is a squadron of Uhlans
attached as well, but as of this writing, I am
not certain how to mix cavalry units, or if I
even want to represent this single squadron on
the gaming table.)
3RD ANGLO-HANOVERIAN DIVISION: LT GEN COUNT CHARLES von ALTEN 3RD DIVISION / I CORPS COMMAND & SUITE 1ST FOOT BATTERY KGL / 3RD
DIVISION 3/0 (5 x 9lb / 1 x 5.5")
Notes: FOG gives 3,315 for the 1st Hanover Brigade. The KGL Brigade numbers 2,147. The single British Brigade in this Division numbers some 2,360. The Division total: 7,822.
1ST DIVISION /
GUARDS: GENERAL SIR
G. COOKE 1ST DIVISION /
GUARDS RESERVE
Notes: FOG gives 2,080 for Maitland's Brigade
and 2,295 for Byng's Brigade. The Division
total: 4,375. R figures four battalions of Guards
at 990 each, for a grand total of 3,960 men.
General Notes: FOG = FIELDS OF
GLORY
For the polyglot force under the command of Wellington, there are 46 battalions of infantry. Ttlis number, in comparison to the 33 French, is superior only in terms of the number of men on the field. In terms of overall quality and experience, the Allied and French forces were on an equal footing. Most infantry divisions have skirmisher stands as well as two batteries of artillery in support. In terms of command and control, the Anglo-Allied force has one overall commander (Wellington), a corps commander (Prince of Orange), five (5) division commanders, and 12 brigade commanders. With respect to the cavalry arm, the AngloAllied is very much outnumbered by the French. They deploy just three (3) regiments (one regiment is considered a separate brigade), and all are classed as Light Cavalry. Relying here too, on the database in FOG for the composition the Anglo-Allied forces, it seems only logical to maintain that reliance with respect to numbers involved. An accounting of the Anglo-Allied force yields the following numbers: 32,505 Infantry, 2,071 Cavalry, 7 batteries of Foot Artillery (46 guns), and 3 batteries of Horse Artillery (22 guns). Quatre Bras: Fields of Rye Sources and Special Rules
Back to MWAN #107 Table of Contents Back to MWAN List of Issues Back to MagWeb Magazine List © Copyright 2000 Hal Thinglum This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com |