by Lionel Levanthal
![]() |
The historian Geoffrey Parker notes, ‘Counterfactual’ calcula-tions have, of course, been scorned by many historians – especially by those who believe that major events must stem from major causes. ‘Two centuries ago, however, Samuel Johnson eloquently demolished these doubts: The caprices of voluntary agents laugh at calculation. It is not always that there is a strong reason for a great event. Obstinacy and flexibility, malignity and kindness, give place alternately to each other, and the reason of these vicissitudes, however important may be the consequences, often escapes the mind in which the changes are made.’ This team of British, Canadian, and American military historians has explored these very alternatives on the premise that history, as Dr Johnson explained, does not run along a well-worn groove. It is a continuously shifting synthesis of chance, design, character, accident and luck, both good and bad. History is a constantly shifting array of decision nodes – the ultimate game of choice and chance based on strategy and guessing in the dark. ” The Battle of the Bulge: Hitler’s Alternate Scenarios will be published later this year. Back to Greenhill Military Book News No. 129 Table of Contents Back to Greenhill Military Book News List of Issues Back to Master Magazine List © Copyright 2004 by Greenhill Books This article appears in MagWeb.com (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other articles from military history and related magazines are available at http://www.magweb.com |