by Keith Raynor
Photos by Sue Brown
The subject of recruiting for the British Army during the wars with Revolutionary then Napoleonic France is a large and at times a confusing topic. This is especially so with reference to the varied Acts and Reforms by which the then British Governments tried to find men for the army without resorting to universal conscription. The whole panoply is enough to fill a book. The reader might find some indication of this in the following short article, which concentrates on the 68th Durham Light Infantry. As can be seen, recruiting was much more than the traditional Sergeant regaling a crowd of onlookers with tales of high deeds, full stomachs and copious amounts of ale. 68th Recruitment Poster (slow: 178K) The 68th Foot had been one of those unfortunate Regiments which had suffered much in the West Indies during the earlier part of the Great War with France. In fact the Regiment had at one point been two battalions strong before disease and yellow fever had whittled its strength down. Between January 1801 and May 1806 the 1st/68th lost 1071 men whilst, before it was disbanded, the 2nd/68th lost between January 1801 and August 1802, 423 men out of a total of 1,494. It was thus a very depleted Regiment which landed at Portsmouth on the 16th August 1806. The return to England found the unit numbering just 23 Officers, 39 Sergeants, 15 Drummers and 109 Other Ranks. The Regiment would have to be rebuilt and that would take time. After disembarking, the 68th marched by stages to Yorkshire where it was to stay for the next eighteen months, first at Leeds, then Ripon. Recruiting parties were sent out by the 68th within a short time of its return in order to bring the regiment back to strength again. These recruiting parties usually consisted of an Officer, Serjeant and a few trusted men, and sometimes a Drummer, the main work usually falling to the Serjeant. By November 1806 fifteen recruiting parties were out,
operating in in such diverse places as : Limerick, Tullamore,
Dublin, Mullingar, Lisburn, Belfast, Edinburgh, Crieff,
Glasgow, Sheffield, Wolverhampton, Freston, Doncaster,
Blanford and Durham. Some of these recruiting parties
travelled from place to place, others became virtual fixtures in
certain towns. [1] The
recruiting parties had some success in bringing the 68th
back to strength, by October 1808, the number of rank and
file in the regiment stood at 436 men.
The 68th though, in common with the Army in general,
would have found recruiting difficult for a variety of
reasons:
2. A further reason why recruiting was difficult
was the relative poverty of the ordinary soldier. For example,
in 1800 the wage of a soldier was 7s 7d a week, while an
artisian's was 18s. In 1806, the soldiers weekly wage was
still 7s 7d, whilst an artisians had risen to 28s. It was
suggested that if Britain was to have an army by voluntary
enlistment, then it had to improve the vocation of the soldier
and bring it into fair competition with other trades and
callings. The most simple way of improving soldiers
conditions. was to raise his pay. It was further suggested
that any improvements in pay were to be coupled with
improvements both in pensions and compensation for those
disabled from further service. Nevertheless, it would take
some time before these measures were endorsed. Britain,
involved in an expensive war, and being paymaster of the
Allies, was to maintain her own army on a tight budget.
3. Potential recruits also feared army service in the West
Indies, where fever had taken an appalling toll of lives, as
the 68th well knew to its cost. In just the first four years of
the war with France, from 1793 to 1796, the West Indies had
cost the army 80,000 men lost to the service, including 40,000
dead. No wonder some lads thought twice or more about joining.
4. The army's discouragement of marriage was also
detrimental to recruiting. There was no allowance for many
regular soldier's wives or accommodation for them. And,
though the era saw a great expansion in barrack building,
married quarters were virtually non-existant. Wives often
had to share the communal barrack rooms with the rest of
their husband's comrades. Wives were expected to help in
camp or barracks by cooking, taking in laundry, sewing or
even nursing if they wanted to stay on the regimental
strength and qualify for an allowance. But many wives were
left with no support if their husbands were posted overseas
and they were not chosen to go with him. Orders printed in
1808 [2] stated that : "Women,
Only in the proportion of six to every hundred men, will be
permitted to embark. They should be carefully selected as
being of good character, and having the inclination and
ability to render themselves useful : It is very desirable that
those who have children should be left at home. All women
above the number prescribed must be sent to their
respective homes, previous to their Regiments marching for
embarkation." [3]
5. The greatest deterrent to recruiting though was the
fact that men enlisted for life. It was a daunting prospect to
sign all your life away. Once in, that was it, unless fever, a
bullet or some such soldier's bane put an end to future
prospects. The survivors' careers ended when a Medical
Board deemed them unfit for further service and returned
them to civilian life. Though in most cases a small pension
was granted to such men many found themselves too old to
learn a new skill or trade with which to supplement this
entitlement. [4]
However, the 68th's return to Britain did coincide with
the enactment by Parliament of the Royal Warrant of 7th
October 1806. This, despite opposition by some senior
generals [5] meant that
men could now enlist in the army for set periods instead of
for life, thus hopefully encouraging more men to join. [6]
John Green of the 68th who enlisted in October 1806
recalled being, "...sworn in for seven years and six months, if
at the expiration of that time it should be peace, or three
years longer, if war should continue, and not for an
unlimited period".
Nevertheless, evidence from the 68th's Inspection
Returns for between 1809 and 1813 indicates that a
substantial number of the regiment was composed of men
who had signed on for unlimited service. Whilst not
denigrating the contributions made by the short service
men, it would be the men who had signed on for unlimited
service who would form the cadre of the Regiment and
provide for the Regiment's long term experience. [7]
The 68th's return to Britain in 1806 also coincided with
the need by the British Army for new Light Infantry
Regiments. The Order converting the 68th to a Light
Infantry Regiment was issued on 10th September 1808; the
68th were to be "...assimilated with regard to their clothing,
arming and discipline to the 43rd and 52nd regiments, and
that, in consequence thereof, an additional Lieutenant,
sergeant and corporal per company be borne on the
establishment ..."
The 68th had no special Light Infantry qualifications
which favoured their conversion to such a corps. The
Regiments C.O. Colonel Farley was aged 57 with 41 years
service and according to Green was, "...highly respected and
much beloved by the men ". However Rottenburgh who
inspected the Regiment in May 1809 reported that Colonel
Farley, "...being a very old man, appears not well qualified for
the command of a light infantry regiment ". This view was
enforced by the Inspecting-General John Hope at the end of
May 1809, " ...it would be of very great advantage to
the service if Colonel Farley of the 68th could be removed
from that corps, to a situation more suited to his age, & which
would at the same time be adequate to his rank and service".
Farley was tactfully removed and appointed to the staff in
Jamaica. Lt. Colonel William Johnstone his replacement was
37 years old with 20 years soldering experience, but still had
no particular Light Infantry background. The reason for the
change lay elsewhere.
The 68th were most probably chosen for conversion to
Light Infantry because the unit now consisted of young new
recruits who were more adaptable to the Light Infantry
training. Sir John Moore had suggested such stating that
the,"...service of light infantry does not so much require
men of stature as it requires them to be intelligent, handy, and
active, and they should in the first instance be young, or they
will neither take to the service nor be easily instructed in it".
This can be borne out by the returns of the 68th's
Inspection Report at Brabourne Lees, 3rd May 1809. The
majority of Privates, Drummers (actually Buglers) and
N.C.O.'s were between the ages of 20 to 30.
[8]
The report also added that the general appearance of the
men had improved,"...by the number of recruits and
volunteers which that corps has received, the volunteers
being particularly good and more adapted to the light
service, than the old men of the Battalion". Finally, this same
report criticised the 68th's recruiting service: the "...Officers
require a great deal of instruction", nevertheless, there were
eleven officers out on recruiting duty.
[1] The distribution
& size of 68th recruiting parties between the years 1809 &
1813 can seen as follows :
[2] Booklet entitled, " General Orders applicable to The Troops destined for Continental Service " 12th July 1808. Printed by W. Clowes, Northumberland Court, Strand.
[3] 68th Regiment. Inspection Return 16th May 1810 Hythe Barracks.
68th Regiment. Inspection Return 16th Oct. 1810 Hythe Barracks.
68th Depot Company Inspection Return 28th Oct. 1811 Silverhill.
68th Depot Company Inspection Return 8th May 1812 Bradbourne Lees.
68th Regiment. Inspection Return 17th May 1812 Castillo Branco.
68th Depot Company Inspection Return 21st Oct. 1812 Bradbourne Lees.
68th Regiment. Inspection Return 9th Feb. 1813 St. Martinha.
[4] Edward
Costello ( 95th Rifle Regt.) in his memoirs recalled the fate of
a discharged comrade, " Any of my readers passing through
Knightsbridge may chance to observe a tall military figure,
bent with years, a bag thrown over his shoulders, stooping
to pick up bones, etc. This person is no other than the once
redoubtable Humphrey Allen, at that time one of the
smartest and finest looking men in our Rifles ". This is not to
say all ex-service men struggled in later life, Lawrence of the
40th, "...drifted between one or two trades and finally took a
little public House ". Morris of the 73rd, " returned home ...
and soon unassisted attained a respectable position in civil
society ". Costello himself, at first suffered near starvation
after discharge but finished up a Yeoman Warder of the
Tower of London. John Green after leaving the 68th at first
took work as a book-hawker in Lincoln and Alford but,
"...success was so indifferent, that I gave it up and returned
to Louth ". Three weeks later he found, "...employment at the
carpet manufactory " but " In consequence of our trade
being very uncertain, and subject to continual change, I
fixed myself in a small way of business, in which I have been
the last six or seven years". Neverless many Veterans did
suffer hardship after being discharged, particularly the long
term enlisted man. Short term enlisters could often return to their old trade.
[5] One of those
who distrusted the changes bought about by the warrant of
October 1806 was General Sir John Moore. In
correspondence between himself and General Craufurd he
listed arguments against short term emlistment. He much
preferred the unlimited service soldier because of the
experience gained and also argued that these soldiers should
be rewarded. He also wrote, "...the service of the Line should
be held so high that no service of any other kind should be
substituted for it, nor any person entitled to the rewards it
holds out by other than actual service in the Line ". He
further added, " After twenty - one years service many men
will be found able and willing to serve, and as soldiers of this
description are invaluable, they should be encouraged to
continue with their regts ". Moore went on, " The pay of the
N.C.O.'s was not raised some years ago, in the same
proportion with that of the men. it is by making their
situation comfortable that a portion of the more respectable
part of the population may be tempted into the army ". He
then added why the present number of old or veteran
soldiers was low, " It is thought, from the returns which have
lately been called for, that a very small proportion of our
soldiery ever attain 14 years service. The returns of the
present army lead to this concluesion; but it must be
recollected that we are now recovering from the effects of a
very destructful St.Domingo and West India war, which
together with the great augmentation made recently to the
army, renders the number of old soldiers at this moment
proportionally small ".
[6] Extract from
the Rules and Regulations, War Office 22nd October 1806.
For the better ordering of His Majesty's Army, and for
improving the condition of soldiers, as contained in His
Majesty's warrant of the 7th October 1806, and in certain
Acts passed during the last session of Parliament.
Periods and Terms of Inlisting.
Men willing to engage for a Third period of service will be re-inlisted,
No N.C.O. or Soldier to be allowed to re-inlist for a second
period of service, until within Twelve months of the end of
his first period, nor for a Third, until within Two years of the
end of his second. The new period in each case not to be
considered as commencing until after the Expiration of the one proceeding.
[7] As can be seen below, the percentage of "unlimited service" men remained more or less constant between 1809 & 1813. Taking each year in turn, the "unlimited service" men (O.R.'s) account for
The figures show that at any one time at least one third of the men in the 68th were of unlimited service, thus eventually providing a pool of experienced men in the Regiment.
[8] The complete age profile from the May 1809 Return is copied below. By way of comparison the age profiles from Returns in 1810 and 1811 are also shown prior to the regiments embarkation to Portugal in 1811.
68th Inspection Return 3rd May 1809 Bradbourne Lees.
68th Inspection Return 16 May 1810 Hythe Barracks
68th Inspection Return 16 October 18 10 Hyde Barracks
68th Inspection Return 31st May 1811 Lewis
|