Recruiting the 68th

Napoleonic-era British Regiment

by Keith Raynor
Photos by Sue Brown


The subject of recruiting for the British Army during the wars with Revolutionary then Napoleonic France is a large and at times a confusing topic. This is especially so with reference to the varied Acts and Reforms by which the then British Governments tried to find men for the army without resorting to universal conscription. The whole panoply is enough to fill a book. The reader might find some indication of this in the following short article, which concentrates on the 68th Durham Light Infantry. As can be seen, recruiting was much more than the traditional Sergeant regaling a crowd of onlookers with tales of high deeds, full stomachs and copious amounts of ale.

68th Recruitment Poster (slow: 178K)

The 68th Foot had been one of those unfortunate Regiments which had suffered much in the West Indies during the earlier part of the Great War with France. In fact the Regiment had at one point been two battalions strong before disease and yellow fever had whittled its strength down. Between January 1801 and May 1806 the 1st/68th lost 1071 men whilst, before it was disbanded, the 2nd/68th lost between January 1801 and August 1802, 423 men out of a total of 1,494. It was thus a very depleted Regiment which landed at Portsmouth on the 16th August 1806. The return to England found the unit numbering just 23 Officers, 39 Sergeants, 15 Drummers and 109 Other Ranks. The Regiment would have to be rebuilt and that would take time.

After disembarking, the 68th marched by stages to Yorkshire where it was to stay for the next eighteen months, first at Leeds, then Ripon. Recruiting parties were sent out by the 68th within a short time of its return in order to bring the regiment back to strength again. These recruiting parties usually consisted of an Officer, Serjeant and a few trusted men, and sometimes a Drummer, the main work usually falling to the Serjeant.

By November 1806 fifteen recruiting parties were out, operating in in such diverse places as : Limerick, Tullamore, Dublin, Mullingar, Lisburn, Belfast, Edinburgh, Crieff, Glasgow, Sheffield, Wolverhampton, Freston, Doncaster, Blanford and Durham. Some of these recruiting parties travelled from place to place, others became virtual fixtures in certain towns. [1] The recruiting parties had some success in bringing the 68th back to strength, by October 1808, the number of rank and file in the regiment stood at 436 men.

The 68th though, in common with the Army in general, would have found recruiting difficult for a variety of reasons:

    1. A career in the army was looked down upon by many in society both rich and poor, which meant the "better" sort of recruit was hard to come by. This was possibly coupled with a distrust of the army. In the absence of a properly organised civilian police force the army had to be called in to keep order. This was particularly so during the Luddite disturbances. The army was seen as enforcing the distress caused by the emerging factory system of the Industrial Revolution.

    2. A further reason why recruiting was difficult was the relative poverty of the ordinary soldier. For example, in 1800 the wage of a soldier was 7s 7d a week, while an artisian's was 18s. In 1806, the soldiers weekly wage was still 7s 7d, whilst an artisians had risen to 28s. It was suggested that if Britain was to have an army by voluntary enlistment, then it had to improve the vocation of the soldier and bring it into fair competition with other trades and callings. The most simple way of improving soldiers conditions. was to raise his pay. It was further suggested that any improvements in pay were to be coupled with improvements both in pensions and compensation for those disabled from further service. Nevertheless, it would take some time before these measures were endorsed. Britain, involved in an expensive war, and being paymaster of the Allies, was to maintain her own army on a tight budget.

    3. Potential recruits also feared army service in the West Indies, where fever had taken an appalling toll of lives, as the 68th well knew to its cost. In just the first four years of the war with France, from 1793 to 1796, the West Indies had cost the army 80,000 men lost to the service, including 40,000 dead. No wonder some lads thought twice or more about joining.

    4. The army's discouragement of marriage was also detrimental to recruiting. There was no allowance for many regular soldier's wives or accommodation for them. And, though the era saw a great expansion in barrack building, married quarters were virtually non-existant. Wives often had to share the communal barrack rooms with the rest of their husband's comrades. Wives were expected to help in camp or barracks by cooking, taking in laundry, sewing or even nursing if they wanted to stay on the regimental strength and qualify for an allowance. But many wives were left with no support if their husbands were posted overseas and they were not chosen to go with him. Orders printed in 1808 [2] stated that : "Women, Only in the proportion of six to every hundred men, will be permitted to embark. They should be carefully selected as being of good character, and having the inclination and ability to render themselves useful : It is very desirable that those who have children should be left at home. All women above the number prescribed must be sent to their respective homes, previous to their Regiments marching for embarkation." [3]

    5. The greatest deterrent to recruiting though was the fact that men enlisted for life. It was a daunting prospect to sign all your life away. Once in, that was it, unless fever, a bullet or some such soldier's bane put an end to future prospects. The survivors' careers ended when a Medical Board deemed them unfit for further service and returned them to civilian life. Though in most cases a small pension was granted to such men many found themselves too old to learn a new skill or trade with which to supplement this entitlement. [4]

However, the 68th's return to Britain did coincide with the enactment by Parliament of the Royal Warrant of 7th October 1806. This, despite opposition by some senior generals [5] meant that men could now enlist in the army for set periods instead of for life, thus hopefully encouraging more men to join. [6]

John Green of the 68th who enlisted in October 1806 recalled being, "...sworn in for seven years and six months, if at the expiration of that time it should be peace, or three years longer, if war should continue, and not for an unlimited period".

Nevertheless, evidence from the 68th's Inspection Returns for between 1809 and 1813 indicates that a substantial number of the regiment was composed of men who had signed on for unlimited service. Whilst not denigrating the contributions made by the short service men, it would be the men who had signed on for unlimited service who would form the cadre of the Regiment and provide for the Regiment's long term experience. [7]

The 68th's return to Britain in 1806 also coincided with the need by the British Army for new Light Infantry Regiments. The Order converting the 68th to a Light Infantry Regiment was issued on 10th September 1808; the 68th were to be "...assimilated with regard to their clothing, arming and discipline to the 43rd and 52nd regiments, and that, in consequence thereof, an additional Lieutenant, sergeant and corporal per company be borne on the establishment ..."

The 68th had no special Light Infantry qualifications which favoured their conversion to such a corps. The Regiments C.O. Colonel Farley was aged 57 with 41 years service and according to Green was, "...highly respected and much beloved by the men ". However Rottenburgh who inspected the Regiment in May 1809 reported that Colonel Farley, "...being a very old man, appears not well qualified for the command of a light infantry regiment ". This view was enforced by the Inspecting-General John Hope at the end of May 1809, " ...it would be of very great advantage to the service if Colonel Farley of the 68th could be removed from that corps, to a situation more suited to his age, & which would at the same time be adequate to his rank and service".

Farley was tactfully removed and appointed to the staff in Jamaica. Lt. Colonel William Johnstone his replacement was 37 years old with 20 years soldering experience, but still had no particular Light Infantry background. The reason for the change lay elsewhere.

The 68th were most probably chosen for conversion to Light Infantry because the unit now consisted of young new recruits who were more adaptable to the Light Infantry training. Sir John Moore had suggested such stating that the,"...service of light infantry does not so much require men of stature as it requires them to be intelligent, handy, and active, and they should in the first instance be young, or they will neither take to the service nor be easily instructed in it".

This can be borne out by the returns of the 68th's Inspection Report at Brabourne Lees, 3rd May 1809. The majority of Privates, Drummers (actually Buglers) and N.C.O.'s were between the ages of 20 to 30. [8]

The report also added that the general appearance of the men had improved,"...by the number of recruits and volunteers which that corps has received, the volunteers being particularly good and more adapted to the light service, than the old men of the Battalion". Finally, this same report criticised the 68th's recruiting service: the "...Officers require a great deal of instruction", nevertheless, there were eleven officers out on recruiting duty.

Notes

[1] The distribution & size of 68th recruiting parties between the years 1809 & 1813 can seen as follows :

    Inspection Return 3rd May 1809 20 Officers recruiting.
    Inspection Return 16th May 1810 9 Officers recruiting.
    Inspection Return 16th Oct 1810 12 Officers recruiting.
    Inspection Return 31st May 1811 9 Officers recruiting at, Maghara, Armagh, Omagh, Dublin, Mufsellburgh, Leeds, Bath, Ipswich & Durham.
    Inspection Return 28th Oct. 1811 : 6 Officers recruiting at, ( Depot Company ) Dublin, Armagh, Edinburgh, Leeds, Ipswich & Durham.
    Inspection Return 8th May 1812 : 6 Officers recruiting at,( Depot Company) Dublin, Armagh, Knaresborough, Southampton, Ipswich & Durham.
    Inspection Return 17th May 1812 : 4 Officers recruiting at, Armagh, Leeds, Ipswich & Durham.
    Inspection Return 21st Oct. 1812 : 3 Officers recruiting at, ( Depot Company ) Armagh, Dublin & Durham.
    Inspection Return 9th Feb. 1813 : 3 Officers recruiting at, Dublin, Armagh & Durham.

[2] Booklet entitled, " General Orders applicable to The Troops destined for Continental Service " 12th July 1808. Printed by W. Clowes, Northumberland Court, Strand.

[3] 68th Regiment. Inspection Return 16th May 1810 Hythe Barracks.

Number of women
legally married
Male Children Female Children
Under 10Above 10TotalUnder 10Above 10 Total
612202225025

68th Regiment. Inspection Return 16th Oct. 1810 Hythe Barracks.

Number of women
legally married
Male Children Female Children
Under 10Above 10TotalUnder 10Above 10 Total
742602626127

68th Depot Company Inspection Return 28th Oct. 1811 Silverhill.

Number of women
legally married
Male Children Female Children
Under 10Above 10TotalUnder 10Above 10 Total
201211316117

68th Depot Company Inspection Return 8th May 1812 Bradbourne Lees.

Number of women
legally married
Male Children Female Children
Under 10Above 10TotalUnder 10Above 10 Total
211411512214

68th Regiment. Inspection Return 17th May 1812 Castillo Branco.

Number of women
legally married
Male Children Female Children
Under 10Above 10TotalUnder 10Above 10 Total
734144526127

68th Depot Company Inspection Return 21st Oct. 1812 Bradbourne Lees.

Number of women
legally married
Male Children Female Children
Under 10Above 10TotalUnder 10Above 10 Total
211411510212

68th Regiment. Inspection Return 9th Feb. 1813 St. Martinha.

Number of women
legally married
Male Children Female Children
Under 10Above 10TotalUnder 10Above 10 Total
23303505

[4] Edward Costello ( 95th Rifle Regt.) in his memoirs recalled the fate of a discharged comrade, " Any of my readers passing through Knightsbridge may chance to observe a tall military figure, bent with years, a bag thrown over his shoulders, stooping to pick up bones, etc. This person is no other than the once redoubtable Humphrey Allen, at that time one of the smartest and finest looking men in our Rifles ". This is not to say all ex-service men struggled in later life, Lawrence of the 40th, "...drifted between one or two trades and finally took a little public House ". Morris of the 73rd, " returned home ... and soon unassisted attained a respectable position in civil society ". Costello himself, at first suffered near starvation after discharge but finished up a Yeoman Warder of the Tower of London. John Green after leaving the 68th at first took work as a book-hawker in Lincoln and Alford but, "...success was so indifferent, that I gave it up and returned to Louth ". Three weeks later he found, "...employment at the carpet manufactory " but " In consequence of our trade being very uncertain, and subject to continual change, I fixed myself in a small way of business, in which I have been the last six or seven years". Neverless many Veterans did suffer hardship after being discharged, particularly the long term enlisted man. Short term enlisters could often return to their old trade.

[5] One of those who distrusted the changes bought about by the warrant of October 1806 was General Sir John Moore. In correspondence between himself and General Craufurd he listed arguments against short term emlistment. He much preferred the unlimited service soldier because of the experience gained and also argued that these soldiers should be rewarded. He also wrote, "...the service of the Line should be held so high that no service of any other kind should be substituted for it, nor any person entitled to the rewards it holds out by other than actual service in the Line ". He further added, " After twenty - one years service many men will be found able and willing to serve, and as soldiers of this description are invaluable, they should be encouraged to continue with their regts ". Moore went on, " The pay of the N.C.O.'s was not raised some years ago, in the same proportion with that of the men. it is by making their situation comfortable that a portion of the more respectable part of the population may be tempted into the army ". He then added why the present number of old or veteran soldiers was low, " It is thought, from the returns which have lately been called for, that a very small proportion of our soldiery ever attain 14 years service. The returns of the present army lead to this concluesion; but it must be recollected that we are now recovering from the effects of a very destructful St.Domingo and West India war, which together with the great augmentation made recently to the army, renders the number of old soldiers at this moment proportionally small ".

[6] Extract from the Rules and Regulations, War Office 22nd October 1806.

For the better ordering of His Majesty's Army, and for improving the condition of soldiers, as contained in His Majesty's warrant of the 7th October 1806, and in certain Acts passed during the last session of Parliament.

Periods and Terms of Inlisting.

    In the Infantry 7 years
    In the Cavalry 10 years
    In the Artillery 12 years
Men willing to engage for a second period of service will be re-inlisted,
    In the Infantry 7 years
    In the Cavalry 7 years
    In the Artillery 5 years

Men willing to engage for a Third period of service will be re-inlisted,

    In the Infantry 7 years
    In the Cavalry 7 years
    In the Artillery 5 years

No N.C.O. or Soldier to be allowed to re-inlist for a second period of service, until within Twelve months of the end of his first period, nor for a Third, until within Two years of the end of his second. The new period in each case not to be considered as commencing until after the Expiration of the one proceeding.

[7] As can be seen below, the percentage of "unlimited service" men remained more or less constant between 1809 & 1813. Taking each year in turn, the "unlimited service" men (O.R.'s) account for

    Inspection Return 3rd May 1809. 216 out of 656 men. 32.9%
    Inspection Return 16th May 1810. 195 out of 578 men. 33.7%
    Inspection Return 31st May 1811. 301 out of 715 men. 42.0 %
    Inspection Return 17th May 1812. 184 out of 527 men. 34.9%
    Inspection Return 9th Feb. 1813. 217 out of 525 men. 41.3%

The figures show that at any one time at least one third of the men in the 68th were of unlimited service, thus eventually providing a pool of experienced men in the Regiment.

[8] The complete age profile from the May 1809 Return is copied below. By way of comparison the age profiles from Returns in 1810 and 1811 are also shown prior to the regiments embarkation to Portugal in 1811.

68th Inspection Return 3rd May 1809 Bradbourne Lees.

AgeSerjeantsCorporalsDrummersPrivates
45 & upwards1001
40 & upwards00014
35 & upwards83050
30 & upwards2214188
25 & upwards14223220
20 & upwards132171
18 & upwards01785
Under00527
Total464318656

68th Inspection Return 16 May 1810 Hythe Barracks

AgeSerjeantsCorporalsDrummersPrivates
50 & upwards0001
45 & upwards1107
40 & upwards13016
35 & upwards132036
30 & upwards25120110
25 & upwards8256219
20 & upwards056145
18 & upwards00437
Under0057
Total484821578

68th Inspection Return 16 October 18 10 Hyde Barracks

AgeSerjeantsCorporalsDrummersPrivates
55 & upwards0001
50 & upwards1000
45 & upwards0004
40 & upwards31023
35 & upwards96054
30 & upwards2511081
25 & upwards12261208
20 & upwards0410172
18 & upwards00752
Under00411
Total504822606

68th Inspection Return 31st May 1811 Lewis

AgeSerjeantsCorporalsDrummersPrivates
50 & upwards1001
45 & upwards0006
40 & upwards1208
35 & upwards127051
30 & upwards2312181
25 & upwards11243197
20 & upwards197258
18 & upwards001097
Under00216
Total495423715


Back to Table of Contents -- Age of Napoleon #32
Back to Age of Napoleon List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List
© Copyright 1999 by Partizan Press.
This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com