Austrian Naval Flag
at Trafalgar

From a Spanish Vessal?

Part 2

by Dave Hollins


Routes to the 'Neptuno'

The flag (damage shown at right), which hangs in the church at Selling is certainly an 1787 pattern Austrian naval flag, but how could it have got aboard the Spanish Neptuno by 21st October 1805?

The important point is that this flag was worn by merchantmen as well as the Imperial navy and the lack of an 'F II' on the Bindenschild suggests it is more likely to be a post-1804 flag. The lack of any accompanying Wimpel pennant with the Selling flag also supports the likelihood of it being a post- 1804 merchant flag. The discontinuance of the 'F II' would not have occurred overnight as flags continued in use beyond the 'regulation' change supporting a later date, albeit it is not clear whether merchant flags always carried the 'F II' prior to 1804.

Prior to 1797, Austria's merchant fleet was a small outfit moving mainly out of Ostend (Belgium being an Austrian possession from 1714 to 1795) and Trieste, but the military force was minute, being nothing more than a coastal force in the Adriatic. Thus, the military could neither protect its merchantmen or control use of its flag. The problem became much worse after Venice was acquired in 1797.

To a certain extent, the Austrian flag became a 'flag of convenience', the old style already being used by Neopolitan and Dutch merchantmen in the Far East during the brief existence of the 'Trieste-East India Company' from 1777 to 1786.

It is even said, but I have never seen any supporting evidence, that pirates used it, reversing the colours of the old Doppeladler flag to create the Jolly Roger. If the eagle's wings are bent round far enough, perhaps there could be something to it, but this story must be treated with scepticism.

More important were piratical tactics. One method of sneaking up on their victim was to pretend to be a merchantman, but once at close quarters, down would go the 'merchant flag' and the hapless victim would be attacked. An Austrian flag would probably have attracted little attention from the major navies operating in the Mediterranean and would be thought harmless by other merchantmen.

This flag could conceivably be a military one acquired on a campaign by a French or allied vessel. As far as Austria was concerned, Spain was essentially neutral from 1795 to Napoleon's invasion of 1808 and so, a direct clash between military vessels seems unlikely. However, in July 1799, a flotilla of 18 Austrian privateers were fitted out in Leghorn (Livorno) in north-west Italy for patrol and merchantmen defence duties, but quickly became involved in private enterprise of their own in this part of the western Mediterranean. Maybe one got tangled up with the Neptuno?

One other route may have been the close relationship between the Habsburgs and the Spanish Bourbons, notably through the wife of Leopold II (1790-92), Maria Louisa of Spain, a sister of King Charles IV of Spain and mother of Emperor Francis Il/l. It may have come to the Neptuno as some sort of gift from the Austrians or perhaps when the two brigs were off Cadiz in 1802.

However, to have reached Neptuno would make it most likely that this would be a merchant flag, taken by a pirate (or perhaps French privateer) vessel, which then used it to disguise attacks on other shipping. One day, perhaps, the Neptuno came to the aid of a Spanish merchantman under attack in the western Mediterranean?

At Trafalgar?

It is claimed that this flag was flying from the Neptuno at Trafalgar. (11) While it was more likely to have been in a locker, modern navies run up every available flag in action to show they are still fighting and presumably this goes back many centuries. Just prior to Trafalgar, Nelson ordered British vessels to fly their jacks in the presence of the enemy, although normally they were only aloft in harbour. (12)

When a vessel surrendered, it signalled this by 'striking its colours', ie: hauling its flags down, but a surplus of flags would prevent any misunderstandings in the event of a flag being shot away. It is possible, given its close resemblance to the red/broad yellow/red stripes of the Spanish flag, that the Austrian flag was in fact hoisted during Trafalgar or alternatively, was just a trophy on board in the flag locker, but its location was confused/amended in the telling of the tale.

That at least seems to cover the possible routes this flag could have taken to Trafalgar, but great care must be taken with attribution of items to famous episodes and from here, the trail points to other more plausible explanations as to how the Austrian flag reached Selling: The initial possibility seemed to be post-Trafalgar: Following the Berlin Decrees of November 1806 creating Napoleon's Continental System and the retaliatory British Orders in Council of the following January, aimed mainly at neutral shipping, maritime relations between Britain and Austria started to break down.

British Response

The British response to Napoleon's Milan Decrees at the end of the following year made it open season on neutral shipping and by early 1808, allegations were rife that British warships were deliberately preying on Austrian merchantmen, which were then taken to Malta as prizes. Relations were broken off in March, although some prizes were then allowed to leave Britain's Mediterranean base.

In April 1809, however, Austria went to war against France. A British squadron, including three ships of the line, operated from the small Adriatic island of Lissa under Commodore Hargood, supporting Austrian operations in Italy and among the Adriatic islands. After defeat at Wagram in July, Austria made peace with France at Schonbrunn in October 1809, ceding her remaining coastline.

On receiving word of this, Hargood handed over his patrol station to a frigate squadron under Captain William Hoste, who became concerned that the Austrians would give their small fleet to the French. So, he promptly seized the largest Austrian warships, the brigs Oreste, Pilade, Delfino and Eolo, (13) and took them to Malta, where they were auctioned off: two each to an American and a Prussian merchant.

The proceeds, some 150,000 florins were remitted to Vienna, (14)or more likely credited against British war loans. Other smaller vessels of the Imperial navy were sold off in situ at various ports around the northern Adriatic.

Were this to be the origin of the flag, its good condition and the lack of 'Fll' in the centre of the Bindenschild would point to the Delfino or the Eolo, as they joined the Imperial Navy after 1804.

A Closer link to Trafalgar

The problem with the theory that the flag was acquired during the sale of Austrian vessels by the British in 1809 is that neither Stephen nor George ever went near the Adriatic. Aside from the Trafalgar campaign, George had been involved in clashes with Spanish vessels off Cadiz, (southern Spain just on the Atlantic side of the Straits of Gibraltar), in early 1797 and later was a crew member of HMS Atlas supporting the defence of rebel-held Cadiz from July 1808 to May 1810, where he was proficient enough in Spanish to be translating intercepted Spanish government correspondence.

Stephen served aboard HMS Pearl in the Toulon blockade of 1799 and the following Egypt expedition up to 1801 and returned to the Mediterranean in 1812 aboard HMS Leopard in support of Wellington's land force. (15)

A closer look at Imperial Austrian policy seems appropriate, which is well documented in the series 'Geschichte der sterreichischen Kriegsmarine', notably the 1802-14 section by von Kuhepach. As mentioned earlier, in 1805, there were various proposals to change the Imperial Navy's red/white/red flag with the Bindenschild, but the reasoning is a little surprising.

From the time Venice and its huge merchant marine were acquired in 1797, these vessels had been re-registered into Trieste to take advantage of its free-port status. However, owing no particular loyalty than to their Venetian owners, the crews of these vessels had been bringing their new flag into disrepute, notably in 1799, when various merchantmen chartered-in to protect Mediterranean shipping had engaged in a little free enterprise of their own.

New Flag

A new flag and certainly a clear distinction between the military and merchant was viewed as one way of restoring the Imperial Navy's tarnished reputation. Whilst the flag change didn't take place, from 1804, merchantmen were no longer allowed to fly the Wimpel.

It may seem odd to a late 20th century enthusiast that the Austrian and Spanish flags could be confused and so, it might be thought that there is no real truth in any Spanish connection with the Hilton family's acquisition of the flag. However, Kuhepach's book produces a clear possibility that this was the case, and most helpfully, just prior to Trafalgar.

Spain had declared war on Britain in December 1804 in support of Napoleon's France, and the second reason for Austrian plans to change their flag in mid 1805 was that Austrian authorities were indeed concerned that the close similarity between the Spanish and Austrian flags had already brought some Austrian vessels into awkward situations with British vessels. (16) British vessels had been in action against Spanish escorts of their American treasure fleets as early as September 1804.

Following the outbreak of the trouble with the Moroccans at the end of 1802, two brigs, the Oreste and Pillade, went on station in the area in 1803 and based their convoy activities out of Cadiz in particular, where a dreadful storm blew up during the night of 19th December 1804. 23 vessels were driven aground, the Oreste being the only one to escape, but badly damaged, she was put into a private Spanish yard at Los Pimtales, where all her equipment which was saved was put into magazine stores until she emerged from the yard on 18th May 1805.

By then, the Anglo-Spanish war was well underway and her Captain had to negotiate a passage out through the British blockade of Cadiz on the basis of previously good Austro-British relations, (the Third Coalition of that year not having been formed yet). The Polluce moved on to the station to replace Oreste and she was operating both out of Gibraltar and Cadiz in the middle of 1805, presumably with British and Spanish co-operation.

Consult the Sultan

There were certainly great efforts being made to come to an arrangement with the Sultan of Morocco in which the Austrians and Spanish worked closely together. Although not officially a joint mission, a consul was appointed to the Sultan in mid-1805 when a new treaty was concluded between the Sultan and Austria.

While officially acting for Austria, Mr. Salmon also represented Spanish interests. The original suggestion about a direct link with the Barbary pirates seems unlikely, but one of the reasons for not changing the Imperial flag was the fear that these pirates would resume their activities, claiming ignorance of the changes for some time after.

Confusion over the flags and notably the Austrian and Spanish ensigns may well have extended beyond the pirates into the Royal Navy, especially as, except to someone as well educated as George Hilton, a boatload of ex-Venetian Italian sailors would not seem that different from a boatload of Spaniards. Should a British vessel have mistakenly taken an Austrian merchantman, there would not have been any follow-up from Vienna, as the Venetian territories were ceded to Napoleon's recently-created Kingdom of Italy in December 1805 at which stage the ax-Venetian vessels returned to their home registry and state.

This time, the position with the Hiltons is somewhat better: Stephen Hilton, was aboard HMS Queen in 1804 to early 1805, before joining HMS Minotaur in March 1805 (to June 1806), being promoted to Lieutenant on 22nd January 1806. In the run-up to Trafalgar, HMS Minotaur left British waters in May 1805 and joined the blockade of Cadiz. The squadron's remit included the searching of neutral as well as enemy vessels, the first Adriatic vessel boarded being a merchant brig from Ragusa, (now Dubrovoik) on 12th June. (17)

Captain's Log

The Captain's log mentions numerous boardings of neutral vessels, although no Austrian vessels are specified, albeit one vessel closely examined by the squadron was an Algerian corsair. Tensions rose in early October and the squadron went to war stations. After Trafalgar, Minotaur took the Neptuno in tow as a prize vessel to Gibraltar and then moved up to Carthagena, (on the Spanish Mediterranean south-east coast to continue the blockade certainly as far as the end of 1805.

Many vessels coming from the eastern Mediterranean called at Cartagena and it is possible that in early 1806, when Venetian merchantmen were re-registering back to Venice, (taking the Kingdom of Italy flag, following the Treaty of Pressburg), that one may have given its old flag to the Minotaur.

As for the Hiltons, already promoted to Lieutenant in 1801, George Hilton was aboard the Ville de Paris from August 1804 to February 1807, but was restricted the English Channel. Certainly, George left no issue, which may explain how the Austrian flag came to join the Minotaur's Union Jack, if George rather than Stephen acquired it originally. However, it has not yet been possible to locate the details of Robert, who served aboard HMS Swiftsure at Trafalgar.

Restoration

Both the Austrian flag and the Union Jack are now in urgent need of thorough cleaning and restoration, which will cost about œ 2000 each. In addition will be the considerable costs of displaying them in new glass cabinets. Unless it can be shown that the Austrian flag was taken at least during the Trafalgar campaign, funding from the main nautical institutions in this country is unlikely to be forthcoming. Whichever route the Austrian flag may have taken, a connection with Trafalgar itself depends on the activities of the Neptuno herself.

I would be very grateful to hear from our Spanish readers and other enthusiasts about the Neptuno's career and whether Spanish vessels adopted the practice of running up as many flags as possible in battle.

Unfortunately, the Trieste records probably do not exist anymore, so one can never be absolutely certain about the origins of this flag. More research needs to be done amongst Royal Navy vessel logs and a subsequent article will hopefully take the search on.

Sources

The Nelson Society Chairman, Alan Pigon and his correspondence with the National Maritime Museum, Mr C v Taylor, Church Warden of St. Mary the virgin, Seiling, Kent, and flag restorers, my thanks to them; R von Kuhepach: 'Geschichte der sterreichischen Kriegsmarine 1802-14.' (1942)
L Sondhaus: The Habsburg Empire and the Sea Austrian Naval Policy, 1797- 1866 (1989) (Purdue Univ., Indiana, USA)
K. Gogg: 'Osterreichs Kriegsmarine' (1972) (Vienna)
Militana Austriaca No.1 (1977), the Journal of the Austrian 'Geseilschaft f,Msterreichische Heereskunde' pp.2s4o:'Die Entwicklungen der Osterreichischen Marineflagge'.
A Sokol 'The Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarran Navy' (l968) IUSNI)
M von Angeli: 'Erzherzog Yarl ais Feldherr und Heeresorganisator' (1896)
O'Byrne:'Naval Biographical Dictionary'(undated)
Exhibits in the Army Museum, Vienna
Public Records Office, Kew, London: Captain's Logs for HMS Minotaur 1805 (ADM 51/1533)

Notes

(1) Letters from the Nelson Society, based on documents provided by the Hilton family and information from the National Maritime Museum
(2) Miiitaria Austriaca, p 31:
(3) Dolleczek p 163;
(4) dino p 164 and Militaria Austriaca p 31;
(5) Militaria Austriaca p 31;
(6) Gogg p.36;
(7) Angeli Vol.1b p 141;
(8) A brig was a two-masted, square rigged vessel;
(9) Gogg p 38 and ship iists;
(10) Formerly Venetian cutters, salvaged and rerigged in eady 1798; Sondhaus p 14.;
(11) Correspondence with the Nelson Society;
(12)10th Oct.1805 - information from the National Maritime Museum;
(13) Delfino was purchased as the Assur, a merchantman, in Julv 1806 and armed as a 4 gunner at the end of August; Eolo was a 20 gun brig, one of the few vessels built by the Austrians in Venice. Built in 1804-5 as the Castore, but launched as the Eolo in August 1805.
(14) Sondhaus pp. 21-22, Gogg p. 43 44 and ship lists.
(15) O'Byrne - entries for George and Stephen Hilton.
(16) von Kubepach, pp.89-90 for the reasoning behind changing the flag.
(17) HMS Minotaur: Captain's Log 1805

Austrian Naval Flag at Trafalgar (part 1)


Back to Age of Napoleon No. 22 Table of Contents
Back to Age of Napoleon List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master List of Magazines

© Copyright 1997 by Partizan Press.
This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web.
Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com