Further Intelligence Reports

14 and 15 June 1815

by John Hussey, UK

Thanks to the generosity of two good friends in Belgium, Mr Philippe de Callatay and Dr Jacques Logie, I have seen two hitherto unpublished documents bearing upon the opening of the Waterloo campaign and unearthed by Dr Logie in the Nationaal Archief at The Hague. [1]

I offer them here because of their intrinsic value.

First Document

The first document is a letter from Major-General van Reede, Netherlands military commissioner at Wellington’s headquarters in Brussels, [2] addressed to Baron van Capellen, the Netherlands Secretary of State for the Belgic provinces, also based in Brussels.

It is three pages long, written in French in an elegant and very legible hand. Enclosed with it is a second document one-and-a-half pages long, in legible French, unheaded and unsigned but stated by van Reede as written by the Director of Police in the Department of Jemappes.

Jemappes itself is about 2 miles west of the Netherlands fortified town of Mons and thus some 12 miles west of Binche where Wellington’s Anglo-Allied outposts touched those of Blücher’s Prussians; in other words the information is principally from that part of France opposite Wellington’s sector, with the French frontier town of Maubeuge some 12 miles due south and Valenciennes 17 miles to the WSW of Jemappes.

Van Reede’s letter is only partially accented (and I have left this unchanged) and very lightly punctuated, mainly with commas: in certain places I have replaced commas with semi-colons where the sense of the phrases seemed to require it. The translation into English is mine.

1. Major-General van Reede to Baron van Capellen
Brussels, 15 June 1815
Monsieur le Baron,

I have the honour to send Your Excellency a report of the director of police of the Department of Jemappes which agrees perfectly with the reports received yesterday from General Ziethen; it was not certain from those that Bonaparte had arrived: however everything gave rise to the belief that he was between Maubeuge and Bavai [about 8 miles west of Maubeuge] or in one of those localities. The troops from Valenciennes [19 miles west of Maubeuge] have moved to their right [eastwards] and joined with those which had come [inserted above the line: to Mézières - i.e. 50 miles SE of Maubeuge] to the right of Maubeuge, which was placed on their left, in order to concentrate around that place; an artillery park of 40 pieces of cannon had, it was said, come from Valenciennes.

From these movements one assumes the possibility of an attack on Mons, and if the news continues to indicate this it is probable that the Duke’s army will assemble in the position of Ath [12 miles NW of Mons].

However, up to the present there is no movement on our side so far as I know[;] at least here there is no order given for the departure of troops, so that we appear [paraît-on] still nowise convinced that Bonaparte can have serious schemes of attack, in part because of the disadvantages of his position even in the case of a success at one point, in part because he would be seeking out the army [i.e. his opponents’ army] in its full strength, whereas in letting it enter France it will diminish [in numbers] by the need to leave in rear all which the masking [l’observation] of [French] fortresses will indispensably require.

I was first informed yesterday, Monsieur le Baron, that Prince Louis de Salm- Salm had been arrested but without as yet receiving any detail about what had been found chez lui; as soon as I know anything I shall inform you of it. [3]

Yesterday during the day the Duke of Cumberland [fifth son of King George III, and currently the King’s deputy at Hanover] arrived here and after passing several hours with the Duke has continued his journey to England. In the previous night [Dans la nuit d’auparavant] there arrived an aide-de-camp of Prince Schwartzenberg [supreme commander of the Allied forces, currently in central Germany], Count Paer, as well as the Russian Lieutenant-General Baron de Toll. [4]

My despatch having reached this point I had occasion to see the Duke of Wellington who spoke to me in precisely these terms: I do not believe that we shall be attacked[;] we are too strong. I [van Reede] have learned moreover that the dispositions are such that at need in 6 to 8 hours his army can be concentrated [and that] he intends to remain here in person and generally wait until the French movements are more evident before himself moving. [Ma depeche en étant là j’ai eu occasion de voir le Duc de Wellington qui m’a dit en autant de termes: je ne crois pas qu’on nous attaquera nous sommes trop fort. J’ai appris encore que les dispositions étaient telles que dans 6 à 8 heures son armée peut au besoin être reuni il compte rester ici de sa personne et attendre en général que les mouvements des Français soyent plus prononcés avant de se mouvoir.]

I have the honour to be, Monsieur le Baron,
Your Excellency’s most humble obedient servant,
W F van REEDE

Second Document

2. Report enclosed with the above letter

Mons, 14 June 1815

Information which I consider certain states that the French arrived in force yesterday at Merle-le-Château [Mérbes-le-Château, 8 miles ENE of Maubeuge], that there are estimated to be at least 25,000 men between this point on the Sambre and Solre-le-Château towards Maubeuge.

The officers say that they are very numerous and that they await Bonaparte’s arrival at any moment for the start of hostilities. Napoleon left Paris in the night of 11/12 June according to the Gazette de France. They seem full of ardour and the desire to penetrate into Belgium. News from frontier points towards Valenciennes say that the French advanced posts have been withdrawn, even that there are few [troops] at Valenciennes although 21 thousand men were reviewed there three days ago.

All the French frontier communes are overwhelmed with requisitions of all kinds. The armed forces act like bailiff’s men and furthermore have made numerous arrests of the most important people to ensure the delivery of the required contributions and produce. Police supervision has become so very suspicious that everyone is frightened and in general the inhabitants of the communes pray for the moment when they will be delivered from all such agonies and excessive requisitions, for it is said there are communes from which more is demanded than they possess.

A Commentary

We should first of all remember that Napoleon left Paris at 4 a.m. on 12 June and was at Laon that night, reaching Avesnes on the 13th. His army moved east of Maubeuge and crossed the border into Belgium not long after dawn on Thursday, June 15, 1815, striking against the Prussian army in front of Charleroi, not at Wellington’s at Mons. The Allied high command’s Intelligence had been slow to detect this plan.

The fullest reports of Allied Intelligence in the weeks leading up to the invasion are found in Wellington Supplementary Despatches vol x (1863), p.424 onwards, and may be summarised as follows.

On 6 June reports said Napoleon was leaving Paris that day for Douai (wrong), that artillery was gathering at Laon and that Napoleon’s plan was to make a feint against the Prussians and a real attack on Wellington.

On the 7th reports (wrong) came of the Emperor going to Valenciennes (opposite Wellington’s western sector), and the next day that the Old Guard would go to Maubeuge, the Young Guard and many line regiments to Valenciennes (wrong).

On the 9th the Prussian Major-General von Müffling reported that the main concentration area was Valenciennes-Cambrai, but that the Young Guard would go to suppress the royalist revolt in La Vendée (wrong). That same day Gneisnau believed that the French would withdraw from the Belgian frontier southwards to a Somme-Aisne position.

On 10 June Wellington had received a report (wrong) that Napoleon had reached Maubeuge (only 12 miles due south of Mons in the Duke’s sector) and had gone west to Lille (under 40 miles from the Duke’s supply port of Ostend), while his outpost commander, Dörnberg, thought (wrongly) that Napoleon was already at Laon with 80,000 men.

On the 11th Dörnberg heard that Napoleon had apparently been in Valenciennes for five days and was now in Avesnes (both reports incorrect), while the Duke now thought that the Emperor had still been in Paris up to the 7th (correct); however, Wellington remained concerned over the defences of Mons, the Condé canal and Tournai.

On 12 June Gneisnau at Namur declared that any danger was ‘fast disappearing’, but reports came in that day of a massive concentration forming between Maubeuge and Mézières -- a span of nearly 50 miles, however -- with the Emperor expected at Avesnes, i.e. due south of Maubeuge (on the western flank), while other information suggested that the French would attack on the anniversary of Marengo [14 June].

In sum, much (but not all) of the information suggested that if the French really should attack and were not merely bluffing, then the sector west of Mons and Maubeuge was most at risk.

But the information sent to Brussels and Namur on the 14th was both more precise and more accurate and it indicated a considerable French movement eastwards, with Maubeuge perhaps being at the left flank (and not the centre or right) of Napoleon’s host.

This did not affect Wellington’s views. Gneisnau only began to think of concentrating his ‘widely scattered’ forces at noon that day; towards dusk he thought ‘in case of necessity’ a further concentration might prove wise; around 10 p.m. he believed fighting might be imminent. [5]

To the evidence in WSD I would add three further items highlighting Allied thinking: two of 13 June and the other of the 14th.

The meeting of Blücher’s staff officer Colonel von Pfuel with Wellington and Major-General von Müffling, the Prussian commissioner in Brussels, took place on the 13th and was concerned not with defensive measures but with plans for the Allied invasion routes into France: this meeting is covered in detail by my article The Shadow of Ligny. [6]

The second, a message from the Prince of Orange concerning administrative questions on 13 June, and the third, Orange’s report of frontier activities on the 14th, both appeared in the Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research in 1999. [7]

We know that on the morning of 15 June Müffling was still relying on the previous day’s reports from the Prussian forward commander Lieutenant-General von Ziethen, and now we find van Reede similarly aware of Ziethen’s 14 June reports, besides that of the Jemappes police chief. [8]

The information from the police chief about the sufferings of French civilians at the hands of their own troops strongly suggests that had Napoleon achieved the ‘liberation’ of Belgium his new subjects would have faced difficult times.

Save for van Reede’s letter it has not been noticed, I believe, that Wellington was obliged to give up several hours on Wednesday the 14th to discussions with HRH the Duke of Cumberland. There had been a certain amount of disagreement concerning pay and subsidies for Hanoverian troops and this possibly could have been among the topics raised, but even if it was not it is plain that Wellington’s attention was being distracted by many different inter-Allied or royal protocol matters at this time.

It is interesting that General van Reede should have concluded in Brussels on the 15th, from information just received, that if French movements meant anything they could indicate a possible attack on Mons in the Anglo-Allied sector.

We know from the account of Dörnberg that he himself on 14 June had convinced General Clinton, commanding at Ath, of the imminence of a French attack, though Clinton added that Wellington did not believe it. This disbelief is now independently re-confirmed by van Reede. [9]

The Allies had variously estimated Napoleon’s field army in the North as up to 120,000 men; [10] against this Blücher’s Prussians numbered 130,000 and Wellington’s heterogeneous Anglo-Allied force a further 90,000, excluding garrison troops.

This over-all inferiority of the French informs van Reede’s estimate of the difficulties of Napoleon’s ‘position even in the case of a success at one point’. However, his words show him preoccupied with the Anglo-Allied sector Mons-Ath and hence his next phrase about the danger for Napoleon in ‘seeking out the army in its full strength’ implies, I think, that the opposing army ‘in its full strength’ would outnumber the 120,000 French -- in other words that the Anglo-Allied 90,000 would be joined with the Prussians to form a united and preponderating force. [11]

It was only after writing most of his despatch on 15 June that van Reede saw Wellington. This is perhaps the most interesting part of the letter for van Reede then learned that Wellington still did not expect the Allies to be attacked because of their overall strength, and that the Duke estimated the concentration time needed for his army at six to eight hours.

Wellington’s statement of his determination to make no premature move, preferring to wait for the French to disclose their hand unmistakably, implies that he judged the risk of making a false move greater than the disadvantage of consequent loss of time.

In summary, General van Reede’s letter gives a good deal of fresh and very interesting information on the events of the 14th, the prospects for the coming days as seen by a senior Dutch officer, and the opinions of Wellington on the eve of the campaign.

Notes


[1] The reference is Algemene Staatssecretarie en Kabinet des Konings met daarbij gedeponeerde archieven, 1813-1848, inventarisnr. 6210.
[2] Van Reede (1770-1838) entered the Dutch naval service 1787, then transferred to the army. He served against the French in the early campaigns of the Revolutionary war. In 1814 he became governor to Prince Frederick, younger son of Willem I of the Netherlands, and was promoted Major-General in 1815.
[3] This reference is unclear to me; but Mr Gary Cousins who has provided a wealth of information on the Princes of Salm-Salm in west Germany, says that they had lost their lands by French annexation (and though regained in 1813 were lost to Prussia by the decisions at Vienna in 1815). Dr Logie tells me that Prince Louis, born in 1786, was known for his hostility towards the Napoleonic regime and had had several brushes with the Imperial police.
[4] Toll had been sent by the Tsar to obtain Wellington’s views on the planned invasion of France (WSD, x, 448). This necessitated Wellington’s long reply to the Tsar, written on 15 June (WD, 1838, xii, 470; 1852, viii, 140).
[5] Gneisnau’s opinions are in General von Lettow-Vorbeck, Napoleons Untergang (1904), p.192 and Anlage 6, and as reported by Hardinge, WSD, x, 476; it was Clausewitz who stated that Prussian safety was at risk on 14 June through their over-dispersal (On War, V, ch 13).
[6] ‘The Shadow of Ligny: Hindsight and the Wellington-Pfuel Interview’ in First Empire, No 71, Jul-Aug 2003, pp.12-21.
[7] Note 1530, ‘Two Letters from the Prince of Orange, June 1815’, JSAHR, vol 77, 1999, pp.225-6.
[8] Müffling’s letter of 15 June 1815 to Prussian headquarters in Namur is translated in full in my ‘At What Time on 15 June 1815 did Wellington Learn of Napoleon’s Attack on the Prussians?’ War in History, vol vi (1), Jan 1999, pp.88-116, at p.100.
[9] See my ‘Conversations with the Duke, Dörnberg’s account of the start of the Waterloo Campaign’, in First Empire, No 73, Nov-Dec 2003 pp. 9-15, at p. 10, col a.
[10] See for instance the estimates (10 June) of a spy and of Napoleon’s former War Minister, now a Bourbon courtier, the Duc de Feltre (WSD, x, 449-51).
[11] Wellington had written in his letter of 13 June to Lyndoch of his belief that ‘we are too strong’ for Napoleon (Well Desp, xii, 462; rev edn. viii, 135).


Back to Table of Contents -- First Empire # 81
Back to First Empire List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List
© Copyright 2004 by First Empire.
This article appears in MagWeb.com (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other articles from military history and related magazines are available at http://www.magweb.com