Another Bitter Feud

The Relationship
Between Lannes and Bessieres

by Patrick E. Wilson, USA

In an earlier essay I wrote about the bitter feud that had existed between Marechals Ney and Soult. In this essay I shall write about another feud, one just as severe, as Marechals Jean Lannes and Jean Baptiste Bessieres, two of Napoleon's closest friends, conducted a lively feud until Lannes' death in 1809.

This feud dated back to the early days in Italy when Lannes and the future Marechal Joachim Murat competed for Napoleon's favour. Lannes and Murat were also rivals for the hand of Napoleon's sister Caroline. Initially Napoleon was in favour of Lannes but Murat through his friendship with Bessieres, they both came from the same area of France and had met before the revolution, discredited Lannes in the eyes of Napoleon. It was this issue that would sour relations between Lannes and Bessieres.

Jean Baptiste Bessieres started his military career in the Army of the Pyrenees in 1792 in the 22nd Chasseurs a Cheval but before that he attended college at Cahors where he had met a certain Joachim Murat. Bessieres had, it seems, enlisted in the 22nd Chasseurs as he fled south from Paris having participated in the defence of Tuileries and like another future marechal, Dominique Catherine Perignon, may have been on the way out of the country when he enlisted. Both men were strongly conservative, certainly not revolutionaires, indeed Bessieres continued to powder his hair in the old style throughout his life.

From November 1792 to August 1795 he served with distinction in the Army of the Eastern Pyrenees and ended the campaign as a Captain. Incidentally it was also the army that General Perignon led to final victory at Rosas in 1795. Peace was then concluded and Bessieres' regiment was then transferred to Italy, where chance would have it that he met his old friend from his college days at Cahors, Joachim Murat, who was then Aide-de-Camp to General Napoleon Bonaparte.

In June 1796, at Murat's suggestion, the future Emperor of France appointed Bessieres as commander of his new Guides, a personal bodyguard formed after a very close encounter with the Austrian foe. Bessieres went on to command these troops with his usual conscientiousness and soon became one of Napoleon's few real friends, unfortunately another of these friends was Jean Lannes.

Jean Lannes, a volatile gascon, like Bessieres began his career in the Army of the Eastern Pyrenees. Where, fighting with great bravery and tenacity he established himself as an infantry commander of the first rank and when transferred to Italy in 1795 he was a Colonel with a redoubtable reputation. By April 1796 he was leading an elite force of grenadier and carabineer battalions, playing a leading part at both the Battles of Lodi and Bassano he was soon promoted General of Brigade.

But it was at Arcola that he really made his mark and began his friendship with Napoleon Bonaparte, when he rescued the general when he had become unhorsed in the fighting at the bridge at Arcola. There after Lannes and Bonaparte became firm friends, after he became Emperor Napoleon let only Lannes speak to him with a familiarity that astonished others.

From Italy Lannes followed Napoleon to Egypt where he fought with his usual devotion but also clashed with Joachim Murat. Murat accusing him of relaying his comments about the conduct of the campaign to Napoleon (Murat had openly criticised Napoleon's plans). This episode soured relations between the two men and led to a rivalry that existed until Lannes death, the fact that both were wounded at the Battle of Aboukir and had to lie side by side in hospital did not adhere either to one another. Indeed, on the return from Egypt after Napoleon's successful coup Lannes found himself appointed commandant and inspector of the Consular Guard over Murat, which hardly adhered him to Murat. Though Murat was to gain that which Lannes coveted most, the hand of Caroline Bonaparte. It seems that Caroline was attracted far more by the handsome cavalier then the frequently wounded infantryman, despite Napoleon's wish that it was Lannes she married.

Though it is possible that Caroline may have married Murat to get at Napoleon and establish her own independence, anyhow the marriage turned out to be a surprisingly successful one, Murat being a loving husband and father. Lannes though was not happy, even less so when he knew that the commander of the cavalry of the Consular Guard was none other then Jean Baptiste Bessieres, a friend and confidant of Murat.

It was inevitable that Lannes and Bessieres would come into conflict, especially as Lannes saw Bessieres as something of a toady, a creature of Murat.

The episode, which lit the touch paper so to speak, occurred during the Battle of Marengo, when the French were literally fighting for their lives. General Lannes having held on for most of the Morning at Marengo was then falling back with his troops and requested, or rather demanded that Bessieres, who had just came up with the cavalry of the Consular Guard, to charge the enemy threatening his right flank. Bessieres, who had just seen the infantry of the Consular Guard hacked to pieces by Austrian cavalry and could see Austrian infantry ready to receive him, followed the example of the 72nd Ligne infantry and declined to attack, preferring to preserve his squadrons for later in the day, when they charged in support of General Desaix's successful counter-attack.

It is also probable that Napoleon wanted to preserve his Consular Guard cavalry. But be that as it may, after the battle Lannes accused Bessieres of failing to provide adequate support. This of course did not go down too well with Bessieres, a man known for his conscientiousness and integrity, and consequently when he had the opportunity he supplied the information he knew Murat would use to discredit Lannes.

That information concerned the finances of the Consular Guard for which Lannes was responsible. After the Battle of Marengo Lannes had endeavoured to make the Consular Guard look the part, equipping them in the most gorgeous uniforms and in the process overdrew his account with the military authorities by some three hundred thousand francs. Lannes actually did this to please Napoleon with the appearance of the Consular Guard.

However Napoleon on being told by Murat not only berated Lannes but told him to repay the amount immediately or face court martial within the week. Murat, and perhaps Bessieres too, of course was elated and poor Lannes would have been finished if General Pierre Augereau, a good friend from the Italian campaign had not lent him the money.

Napoleon though still dismissed Lannes from his position and sent him to Portugal as ambassador, where he spent the next five years. This did not prevent him from receiving a Marechal's baton nor from becoming a relatively rich man through his good relations with the Portuguese Prince Regent John. So it may be that Bessieres actions benefited Lannes career, definitely the financial aspect of his life, for the better in the long. It did indeed keep him from coming to blows with Bessieres and Murat.

Next Clash

The next clash between Lannes and Bessieres did not occur until 1807, although Lannes certainly clashed with Murat during the Ulm phase of the 1805 campaign, for which he earned the support of Marechal Michel Ney, who did not like Murat either. Indeed, Ney only just resisted the temptation to run Murat through after he insulted him in an interview. The event that led to further enmity between Bessieres and Lannes was the meeting of the two Emperors, Napoleon and Alexander, when they met on a raft in the middle of the Niemen River.

Each sovereign was to be accompanied by five of his most illustrious generals, Lannes was not included in the five Napoleon choose but Bessieres (along with Berthier, Duroc and Caulaincourt) was despite the fact that Lannes had far more distinguished himself in the 1807 campaign then had Bessieres. To some extent Lannes was to be mollified by his appointment as Duc de Montebello, after a victory he had won the day before the Battle of Marengo but he still harboured a grudge against Bessieres whom he considered to be incompetent.

The final confrontation was to occur in May 1809 at the Battle of Aspern-Essling when Bessieres found himself placed under the orders of Lannes. Seeing Bessieres' Cavalry Reserve inactive Lannes sent Bessieres an order to charge home, it was an order that clearly implied that Bessieres was not doing his duty. But the first two aides-de-camp must have modified the message, as it was clearly not having the intended effect. Summoning another aide-de-camp, de Marbot, Lannes give him the order to repeat and emphasised the words to be used. You understand Sir, Charge home!

Marbot himself fully appreciated the implication of the order, he later wrote: "I perfectly understood that Lannes wished to mortify Bessieres, first by taking a harsh way of reminding him that the Emperor had put him in a subordinate post to himself, and further by finding fault with his management of the cavalry. I was perturbed at being obliged to transmit such offensive expressions to the other Marechal. It was easy to foresee that they might have awkward results; but my immediate chief must be obeyed". [1]

Marbot consequently repeated the order verbatim, Bessiere was not happy and nearly had Marbot punished on the spot but he obeyed the order and pushed back the Austrian advance as Lannes had foreseen. He was greatly pleased and remarked to Marbot: "You see that my stern injunction has produced an excellent effect; but for it Monsieur Le Marechal Bessieres would have fiddled about all day." [2]

However, later that day whilst walking towards Aspern in search of Marechal Andre Massena, Lannes and Marbot suddenly came upon Bessieres, who immediately recognised Marbot, though he did not see Lannes who was slightly hidden by the darkness of the evening. Advancing upon Marbot, he greeted him thus; "Ah it is you, Sir! If what you said to me earlier came from you alone, I will teach you to choose your words better when speaking to your superiors; if you were only obeying your Marechal then he shall give me satisfaction; and I bid you tell him so." [3]

At this Lannes himself stepped forward and spoke to Bessieres, first defending Marbot's actions and then replying to Bessieres' accusation that to order him to charge home was unseemly.

Lannes replying that; "They are quite right Sir, and it was I who dictated them; did not the Emperor tell you that you were under my orders?" [4]

To this Bessieres replied that the Emperor had warned him he must comply with Lannes opinion.

"Know Sir," replied Lannes, "that in military matters people do not comply, they obey! If the Emperor had thought fit to place me under your command, I should have offered him my resignation; but so long as you are under mine, I shall give you orders and you shall obey them; otherwise I shall withdraw the command of the troops from you. As for charging home, I give you the order because you did not do it and because all the morning you were parading before the enemy without approaching him boldly." [5]

At this Bessieres demanded satisfaction and since Lannes was more than happy to oblige, blows would have been exchanged if at moment Marechal Massena had not intervened. "I am your senior, gentlemen, you are in my camp, and I shall not permit you to give my men the scandalous spectacle of seeing two Marechals draw on each other; and that in the presence of the enemy. I summon you therefore, in the name of the Emperor, to separate at once." [6]

Massena then lead Lannes away and thus ended the last confrontation between Lannes and Bessieres, the issue was to be settled the following day for good when Lannes received what turned out to be a mortal wound. Still if Massena had not been present either Bessieres or Lannes would have killed the other in a scandalous duel that would probably have seen the survivor disgraced. It is also clear that this was yet another example of the feud's within the Marechalate of Napoleon's Empire, which, if it allowed Napoleon to retain his power because his rivals were too much at each other's throats, also at times undermined the Empire itself when the Marechals failed to support their colleagues adequately. The Peninsular War contains a number of examples of this and the Battle of Dennewitz in 1813 is a prime example, when Marechal Oudinot failed to provide Marechal Ney with the support he deserved as a fellow officer. Anyone who has read an account of this battle will know what I mean.

Finally did Lannes and Bessieres conduct a bitter feud between themselves? Almost certainly so, especially given Lannes' character, though I suspect that they may have been manipulated by Murat to some degree. The irony is that they were both firm friends of Napoleon and would both die in his service.

References


[1] Marbot, Jean-Baptiste de, Edited by C. Summerville, The Exploits of Baron de Marbot (London: Constable,2000)., p.156
[2] Ibid., p.157
[3] Ibid., p.158
[4] Ibid., p.158
[5] Ibid., p.158-9
[6] Ibid., p.159

Bibliography

Atteridge, A.H., Marshal Murat, King of Naples (East Sussex: The Naval & Military Press, 2001 reprint)
Chandler, David G., (Editor) Napoleon's Marshals (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1987).
Dunn-Pattinson, R.P., Napoleon's Marshals (London: Empiricus, 2001 reprint of 1909 edition).
Hollins, David, Marengo (Wellingborough: Osprey Publishing, 2000).
Marbot, Jean-Baptiste de, (Edited by C. Summerville) The Exploits of Baron de Marbot (London: Constable, 2000).


Back to Table of Contents -- First Empire #67
Back to First Empire List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List
© Copyright 2002 by First Empire.
This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com