“Waterloo: New Perspectives”
& The Hanoverian Archives

by Peter Hofschröer, Germany


The ‘Niedersächsisches Hauptstaatsarchiv’ (Lower Saxon State Archives), fittingly situated near the Waterloo memorial in Hanover, contains important documentary material on the Campaign of 1815. Unlike the Prussian War Archives which are considered to have been largely destroyed in the Second World War, the Hanoverian Archives still contains most of its pre-war collection. This has recently been re-catalogued and given new references. Thanks to comprehensive registers, it is an easy task to find material relevant to the Waterloo Campaign

The relevant documents are contained in the following files:

    Hann. 38D - Records of the King’s German Legion 1803-1816.
    Hann. 41 - Files of the General Command with the Military Files of the London Chancellery of the 18th and 19th Centuries.
    Hann. 48a I - Army Lists and Journals of the Hanoverian Forces, 1660, 1733-1867.

The registers themselves contain a detailed listing of the files. Hann. 41, Section XXI for instance contains reports on the Battle of Waterloo from participating officers. These can be found in files 150 - 152. Schwertfeger, in his “Geschichte der Königlich Deutschen Legion 1803-1816” (2 vols, Hanover and Leipzig, 1907) made extensive use of these archives. In this work on the KGL, he obviously uses the pre-war accession marks which makes checking his work a little tedious at times. However, it is clear from the style and content of Schwertfeger’s book that this author is an authority on his subject. Those references the writer of this article has checked are indeed correct. This is to be expected from a historian so renowned and respected as Schwertfeger. Fortunately, David Hamiiton-Williams, in his “Waterloo: New Perspectives” does use the current accession marks which makes checking his references easier. Doing so proved to be an interesting exercise.

One of the references given by the author of this recent work on the Campaign of 1815 several times is the “Dornberg (sic) MS”. He is obviously referring to Dörnberg, a cavalry brigade commander in Wellington’s army. According to Hamilton-Williams, the “Dornberg MS” can be found in Hann. 41 XXI, 150-6. [1] This reference is not quite correct. Dörnberg’s papers are in Hann. 41 XXI, 152 (1). File 152 contains reports from Hanoverian officers on their unit’s participation in the battle of Waterloo. This is a minor error which can easily be excused as a typographic mistake were the reference itself correct or relevant. However, it is not. Hamilton-Williams claims that this file contains “Major-General Dornberg’s own account of the transmission of Grant’s information”. [2] It does not. It is actually Dörnberg’s official report on the participation of his command in the Battle of Waterloo. One does not even need to visit the Archives to establish this fact. The report itself has been published in Pflugk-Harttung’s “Belie Alliance”. [3]

One could excuse this incorrect use of this reference as one of those occasional errors that people are prone to make. However, the “Dornberg MS” is mentioned again by Hamilton-Williams in another reference. [4] This time, we are told this is the same “Dornberg MS” that Pflugk-Harttung refers to in his “Vorgeschichte”. [5] It is not.

Hamilton-Williams is confusing Dörnberg’s Report on Waterloo deposited in the Hanover Archives with his Manuscript which at one time could be found in the Prussian War Archives in Berlin under accession mark VI. E58. This file is missing, presumed destroyed in World War 2. A comparison of the published versions of the Report and the Manuscript would have established that they were not the same documents. Besides, these references to a “Dornberg MS” by Hamilton-Williams are incorrect and not relevant to the point he is trying to make.

Further references by Hamilton-Williams to the Hanover Archives include several to Hann. 38D. [6] According to this author, the “Notizen MS”, “General Commando MS” and “Kielmansegge MS” can all be found under this reference. In a recent letter to me, Dr. Franke of the Hanover Archives told me that “The Manuscripts you mention cannot be identified without more precise details. You may possibly find them in Hann. 38D and Hann. 48aI.” On examining these files recently, I was unable to locate any such manuscripts. The files listed by Hamilton-Williams are 18, 22, 188, 200, 230-43 and 297. These files contain the following material:

    18 Order and Correspondence Book
    22 General Seniority List 1803-1816
    188 Army Lists
    200 Report on the Battle of Waterloo
    230-43 Various reports, none of which appear to contain the manuscripts listed by Hamilton-Williams.
    297 Casualties 1803-1816.

Kielmansegge’s Report on the Battle of Waterloo can be found in Hann. 41 XXI, 151. It would appear the author’s references are again incorrect and irrelevant.

Hamilton-Williams also makes several references to the “Baring MS”. [7] He claims this is located in Hann. 41 XXI, Nr. 99-137. It is not. Baring’s Report on the Battle of Waterloo can be found in Hann. 41, XXI 152 (8). Also, the quote that Hamilton-Williams uses comes from the published article based on Baring’s journal of the events and not from his Report that can either be found in the Archives or in “Belle Alliance”. [8] Again, he has confused two different sources and considers them to be one and the same. Simply by comparing the two, he could have avoided making that error. The confusion however does not stop there. According to Hamilton-Williams, there is more from Baring to be found in Hann. 38D, Nrs. 230-43. These files contain items such as a history of the artillery of the KGL, a history of the expedition to Spain in 1808, a history of the KGL’s documents, correspondence and orders, but apparently nothing from Baring.

Then come references to the “manuscript account of Captain Christian Wynecken” and of “Captain Christoph Heise”. [9] From the details given by Hamilton-Williams, both Dr. Franke and myself have been unable to locate these manuscripts. Heise was an officer of the 1st Light Battalion of the KGL. There is no report on Waterloo from this unit in Hann. 41, XXI 152 which is where it would most likely be found.

To continue, Hamilton-Williams refers to a “Report of 5th Battalion” found in Hann. 48A, Nrs. 100-30.[10] That is an incorrect reference. The file Hann. 48A does not exist. The file Hann. 48aI contains Army Lists and not Battle Reports. The Report of 5th Battalion is in fact to be found in Hann. 41 XXI 152 [10] .

In short, the writer of this article has yet to find one single reference by Hamilton-Williams to the Hanover Archives that is correct. For readers wishing to check the above, but who are unable to visit these Archives in person, further information on their contents can be found in: Pitz, Dr. Ernst, “Übersicht über die Bestände des Niedersächsischen Staatsarchivs in Hannover” 2 vols, Göttingen 1968.

Footnotes

[1] See “Waterloo: New Perspectives” footnote 25, p 372 and footnote 54, p 375
[2] “W:NP”, footnote 25, p 372.
[3] P101 f.
[4] “W: NP”, footnote 54, p 375.
[5] P 261, f.
[6] “W: NP”, footnote 36, p 379.
[7] “W: NP”, footnote 17, p 387.
[8] P. 106 f.
[9] “W. NP”, footnotes 2 and 4, p 393.
[10] “W: NP”, footnote 10, p 394.


Back to Table of Contents -- First Empire #25
Back to First Empire List of Issues
Back to MagWeb Master Magazine List
© Copyright 1995 by First Empire.
This article appears in MagWeb (Magazine Web) on the Internet World Wide Web. Other military history articles and gaming articles are available at http://www.magweb.com